Michael Zimmerman


Michael E. Zimmerman is professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has written several essays about integral theory, with special emphasis on integral ecology.

In the late 1970s, Zimmerman began publishing essays on environmental philosophy, and in 1983 wrote the first essay interpreting Martin Heidegger as a forerunner of Deep Ecology. In 1981, Zimmerman offered one of the first courses on environmental philosophy ever taught in the United States. During this period, he worked closely with George Sessions, one of the leading figures in the Deep Ecology Movement.

Encountering Ken Wilber's book Up From Eden in the mid-1980s was a conceptual turning point that enabled Zimmerman to appreciate the noble aspects of modernity, as well as its dark side, including Western humanity’s tendency to dissociate itself from and to dominate the biosphere. In 1987, disclosures about the depth of Heidegger’s relationship with National Socialism led Zimmerman to rethink not only Heidegger's thought (in Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity, 1990), but Deep Ecology as well (Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity, 1994). Wilber’s Integral Theory, especially in Sex, Ecology, and Spirituality and A Brief History of Everything, proved particularly helpful to Zimmerman in sorting out the promise and pitfalls of contemporary environmentalism. He uses these books in college courses.

In 1990, Zimmerman asked four leading eco-philosophers (J. Baird Callicott, John Clark, George Sessions, and Karen J. Warren) to join with him to publish one of the first anthologies on environmental philosophy, which will appear this summer in its fourth edition.

Michael Zimmerman and Sean Esbjorn-Hargens have co-authored a book called Integral Ecology, now available from Integral Books/Shambhala.

Contributions

Tue, 05/28/2013
Article
Integral Post

These days, discourse about intelligent robots—thinking machines—is as widespread as discourse about zombies. Both have been the subjects of recent bestsellers, which are the basis of two forthcoming films. Popular culture’s depiction of humankind under attack by either the undead or by the never alive (autonomous machines) suggests widespread anxiety about and fascination with technical developments that may generate a future out of human control (as if the future ever were under our control!). Two centuries ago Mary Shelley wrote the mother of all sci-fi novels, Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus (1818). In it, she anticipated today’s efforts to use scientific knowledge for the purpose of artificially creating intelligent beings. Victor Frankenstein never sought anyone’s permission to conduct his astonishing experiment, which went so badly wrong.

Tue, 11/13/2012
Article
Integral Post

We thought we would take a moment to reflect on last week's election—what we see as significant from an integral view, what our next steps should be, and what kind of implications this election has for America, for the world, and for the dawning of an integral age. Most importantly, we want to know what you think about all of this. Let us know in the comments below!

Mon, 10/15/2012
Article
Integral Post

In this post I consider some of the challenges posed by attempts to create artificial intelligence, as well as some of the dangers inherent in comparing human consciousness with AI. According to Ray Kurzweil and transhumanists who promote the coming “Singularity,” within a few decades AI will become self-conscious and will then redesign itself to be vastly more intelligent than humankind. The significance of such an eventuality is difficult to overestimate. If AI does constitute the future of consciousness, then AI may “go all the way up,” in the sense of expanding itself in ways that are to us incomprehensible to us, but that may end up transforming the nature of the universe. However intriguing it is to contemplate such eventualities, they could not occur without taking the first step: creating conscious AI. Will this ever happen?

Mon, 08/06/2012
Article
Integral Post

Although the apparent confirmation of the Higgs Boson, the so-called God particle, has been attracting attention recently, the most vexing problem in science and philosophy remains the mind-body problem: What relation is there between material brain states and conscious, first-person experience? In the past few years, as we shall see in a moment, some neurosciences have now arrived at an answer that was anticipated by Ken Wilber’s version of integral theory. According to Wilber, meager versions of interiority—the antecedents of consciousness—are found at the atomic level, as Alfred North Whitehead suggested in the early 20th century.

Mon, 07/23/2012
Article
Integral Post

In a nutshell, multinaturalism claims that there are many different natures, perhaps as many as there are different cultures. We are naïve, then, if we think—as I once did—that there is One True Nature to which everyone is referring when speaking of nature. Multinaturalists maintain that there is no universally agreed upon concept of nature; instead, specific ideas, histories, values, and beliefs are always helping to construct what shows up as and counts for “nature” in any particular culture.

Fri, 06/15/2012
Article
Integral Post

If half the American population is composed of people who believe that God created the world 10,000 years ago, how can climate scientists and activists persuade people to pay attention to human-caused climate change, given that such change is projected on the basis of complex scientific models? The poll raises questions for people interested in Integral Theory as well. Before turning to those, let’s review some of the poll’s findings.

Sun, 03/18/2012
Article
Integral Post

Recently, a deservedly prominent integral thinker expressed to me his concern that what I have said about anthropogenic climate change may be inadvertently giving comfort to those who claim that humans have no influence on Earth’s climate. Given the consequences of the worst case scenario of climate change, including temperature increases of up to 4 Cº or more and dramatic rises in sea level, I am glad that my interlocutor encouraged me to clarify my position in regard to the role played by humans in climate change. 

Wed, 11/23/2011
Article
Integral Post

Michael Zimmerman offers an example of how truly brilliant artistry can so captivate and seduce us, it completely dissolves the boundary between subject and object until it feels like the the art is somehow creating YOU....

Wed, 11/02/2011
Article
Integral Post

In this fourth and final installation of Michael Zimmerman's "singularity" series, we take a close look at how Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of the Overman as it applies to Ray Kurzweil's description of the immanent technological singularity that we are rapidly moving toward. "What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal," says Nietzsche—but a bridge to what? Let's explore....

Tue, 10/25/2011
Article
Integral Post

According to Ray Kurzweil, a leading advocate and theorist for posthumanism, within a few centuries our successors will be able to redesign the entire universe according to their own preferences. Posthumans will eventually "spiritualize" everything in the universe, including supposedly "dumb" matter/energy.  Such a fully awakened, conscious, and sublimely intelligent universe, Kurzweil writes, "is about as close to God as I can imagine."