Democrats and Republicans: Are We Going in the Wrong Direction?

3.666665
Your rating: None Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

The country is headed in the wrong direction. So say 61% of us in the United States, give or take the weekly fluctuation in the polls. Republicans say the policies of the current administration are taking us in the wrong direction. Democrats say gridlock partisanship and the polarization of wealth are taking us in the wrong direction. Everyone says this election is about which direction we choose for our country. Are all directions created equal, and it’s just a matter of our party affiliation to pick one?

No. We know there are better and worse directions, whether we see this in our own lives (“Do I go to college or become a junkie?”), or writ large in the legacies of leaders like Mandela vs. Hitler. An integral perspective helps us see clearly: not all directions are created “AQAL” – that is, honoring the individual and the group and fostering all stages of development. The developmental journey through levels gives us a pretty clear indication of what it means to “grow up” vs. regress, whether we’re speaking individually or for the society as a whole. As we grow, each level of development becomes an embracing/transcendent step up from the one before it. Individually, for example, we move through the terrible two’s, discovering our ego power, then learning to control our emotions and follow rules; rebellion strikes and rationality emerges, we learn to cast a wider net and grow into a more strategic, sensitive self, and eventually to a more integrated whole. At each step in this process, our sense of self changes and, with that, the world we’re capable of creating (for a lighthearted romp through how much this sense of self matters, I invite you to a 9-min video on The Zen Leader Animated).

Another view into this ascension through levels comes from a Zen Buddhist perspective which talks about “6 realms” that we migrate through. These realms are not geographies, but states of mind, ranging from the raging anger of hell to the greed of hungry ghosts, through conflict, animal nature, human mind and the unconditional acceptance of heavenly mind. I’ve come to think of these as something like a 6-story building that we are always moving up and down through. But as you might imagine, the more primitive our developmental level (might is right!), the more likely we are to hang out on the lower floors. Conversely, the more we move toward our integrated self, and ultimately non-dual consciousness, the more we manifest the truth of the Zen koan, “Every day is a good day.”

For society as a whole, we go through these same levels, depending on where a critical mass of people are in their own development. For example, in the West, we fought our way through tribal times when might was right, we organized ourselves largely around the rules of religion in the Middle Ages, we reached the rebellious Age of Rationality, which led to industrial revolutions; we found that we had to expand our net of concerns to keep from blowing ourselves up or destroying the earth, and the peace movement and green movement emerged. And here we are.

So given this backdrop – this in-our-bones understanding that we are all developing human beings and development moves in a direction that we recognize as “growing up” - we have a very clear litmus test for what are right and wrong directions for ourselves individually and for our nation as a whole. A wrong direction is one that moves us backward in development or down through the realms. A right direction moves us forward or up. It’s pretty simple.

When politicians pull us down toward anger and fear, we are going in the wrong direction. When they pull us up toward what’s possible in our lives, we are going in the right direction.

When politicians play to our personal greed (“Vote for me and I’ll never let a tax bill through no matter what.”) we are going in the wrong direction. When they pull us toward sincere efforts to jointly solve our nation’s financial problems (e.g., the bipartisan Simpson – Bowles Commission), we are going in the right direction.

When politicians demonize their opponents to solidify their base, we are going in the wrong direction. When they acknowledge paradoxical differences and use them to get to higher level truths, we are going in the right direction.

If I were polled today, I would probably join the 61% who say we’re going in the wrong direction, but not because of policies of this administration. Far from it. Rather, because in my lifetime, I have watched partisanship increase as political parties figured out they could make more money by demonizing the other side. I have seen party platforms play on fears, at times pointing more toward feudal warfare and the intolerance of the Middle Ages than even the Age of Rationality. I have heard our political dialogue become more angry and less productive. Working with leaders in business, I find they are forced to be productive, to make compromises, to get things done. But many political leaders see no need to be productive and create unending stalemate while our national bills pile up and problems persist. THESE are the wrong directions that would have me voting with the multitude.

But neither do I despair. For, just as we see in our own lives, and as psychologists and sociologists would tell us from their research, development is a messy process. It’s not linear, straightforward or always up. It’s hit and miss, stretch and retrench, two steps forward and one step back. And even this messy time in our collective political life is unfolding as it needs to. Today is a perfectly good day.

But when I vote, and I speak for the growth urge in all of us, I will choose the leader who is most able to move us forward and up. Democrats and Republicans, are you listening?

About the author: Dr. Ginny Whitelaw is a leadership expert and Zen master in the Chozen-ji line of Rinzai Zen. She is the author of The Zen Leader (www.thezenleader.com), President of Focus Leadership, and founder of the Institute for Zen Leadership

3.666665
Your rating: None Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

Be Progressive!

This is a fun discussion, but I am guessing that 99% of the people who will read and listen to this are Democrats, Progressive, Green Party people.  I don't want to "demonize" Republicans, but I don't want to live in a county that they run.  We should always try to work from a higher level, but let's not kid ourselves that we can work with right wing conservatives to build a great society.  Not going to happen.

Life During Wartime

The old Einsteinian adage (that we cannot solve problems using the logic of the level that created them) comes to play.  It suggests, oddly, that the answer to the problem of partisanship must avoid the "usual response" of siding against partisanship, demonizing it, etc.  Pavel's assertions are indicative of this direction.  

History ebbs and trends but the worst contemporary politics as less hyberbolic, partisan, than 19th century American politics.  So we don't know if it's getting worse.  But the feeling that it's getting worse?  THAT is certainly increasing.  We might call this feeling the current political dogma of the structural forces which create today's America.  Almost everyone tacitly agrees.  That is where we expect to find Ideology in the Marxist sense.  Perhaps I will be forgiven for suspecting this very attitude is evidence of the non-solution, the non-path to enhanced democratic society.

Too much partisanship!  Is that an alternative to the current system... or its universal self-articulation?

Now it goes with saying (no! don't say it!) that there IS a social developmental which parallels individual human complexification in its tendency to fold and harmonize apparent dualities from previous levels... resulting in a more slippery, more universal set of dichotomies.  We definitely CAN expect more integral populations, moving in roughly the right direction (as Ginny observes), will become less obvious and self-thwarting about their partisanship.  

We should consider, however, the need to artfully combine our tactical efforts (to utilize and transform the political process into a higher grade of war-by-other-means) AND at the same time progressively surrender the error of imbalancing ourselves by trying to create balance.  

The student sitting zazen first moves in a pointless orbit of strategies to get comfortable.  After a while this whole attempt starts to show up as the driver of the discomfort.  Analogously, the sense of hyper-partisan political deadlock in Westen nations (particularly America) may be understood as part of the problem... the driver of the various attempts.  In the long run they tend to circle around and re-generate the kind of system we have.  Our options in response are a loop-dance showing the different postures which contribute to perpetuating the current field of the dominant patterning structures of our politics.

So our moves to (generatively and tactically) empower "change in the better of two directions" should be supplemented smoothly by the historical awareness that rebellion attracts conformists and radical change is more often wrought by people who think they are affrming the standard than by people who believe in shifting paradigms.  These two sentiments are truly the two wings of our poltical bird.  

(But, as addendum to any political discussion, I must note here as elsewhere that our capacity to create benevolent change in any circumstance depends more upon general health factors & especially the sophistication of our protocols for compiling collective intelligence than it does upon and particular direction, vision or transformational content.)

Go Ginny.

Yes

Yes.

I agree with Ginny, politics

I agree with Ginny, politics are partisan due to lack of development. Politcs are not partisan by default unless you are partisan by default. When activity in the political sphere (which is also the personal sphere from what I've heard) is based on non-virtue then that is a problem. Maybe not for all perspectives but if you care about humans and animals and nature then it is definitely a problem.

What a wonderfully clear call to the development of discernment in our politics. Thanks, Ginny.

 

 

 

Jeffrey: "Politcs are not

Jeffrey: "Politcs are not partisan by default unless you are partisan by default." 

Pavel: "In my opinion we are partisan by default.  Me, you, all of us (if you have skin, you are a party to yourself, if there is a self, it is self-serving, if you exist you are a figure onto yourself on the backdrop of all that is) (except for those trans-personal moments, peaks, that aren't the baseline or the plateau of functioning).  Kosmos too - in my understanding - is partisan/self-serving (it has no-one else/no-thing else to serve but its boundless Self) (except for that one point when it resets, perhaps, from pan-Samsara of fragmentation to pan-Nirvana of unification/homogenization - if there is ever such a state). 

That's cosmology, but let's get back to politics. My point is this:

1. Politics are about representation of a group by an individual.

2. All such representation is bias (partiality/subjectivity/injustice) and dualistic (representing group A against exploitation by group B).

3. This is normal duality of mind.

4. Nondual politics are an oxymoron.

5. Politics are a social activity that, by default, exists at the level of ego (guided by the reality principle which is fundamentally dichotomous, dualistic Subject-Object/Self-Other consciousness-software).

6. Justice is Just What Is.

7. Kosmos - to repeat - does not short-change itself.

8. Earth is doing the best it can: all that currently can be currently is.

9. Notice the ordinary perfection of what is.

10. This is reality at its current evolutionary best (at this coordinate of the universe) (but acceptance of "What Is" is of course not surrender or passivity): if reality could be better than it currently is, it wouldn't be what it currently is.  But it is what it is.

11. Politics are not the only way to change the world.

12. In my humble opinion, the Integral Movement should stay out of politics.

13. Why? Today's revolutionaries tend to end up tomorrow's fascists.

14. Call it entropy of idealism.

15: My suggestion to all: Evolve, Don't Revolve (Don't Revolt)!

Kombucha Party

Republican Party, Democratic Party, Tea Party...

Kombucha Party next?

Politics are partisan by default. 

Politics are inescapably divisive. 

Politics are - as Carl Von Clausewitz said - "continuation of war by other means."

There's nothing wrong with politics.

Politics are Skinthink at its evolutionary-jungle best.

Kosmos does not short-change itself.

Ordinary perfection, as always.

(great pic - enso head - by the way).