Ken Wilber claims that it is the artist, and not the art, that defines "Integral Art."

Ken Wilber claims that it is the artist, and not the art, that defines "Integral Art." Posted January 30th, 2010 by barbi hammond in integral art In Reference to: Art, Consciousness, and God: The "I" of Beauty. Part 1: What Is Integral Art?... In response to the... Read More

On Truth-Claims Posited by Rational Orange, Rejection of Truth by Green, I-Integral Art is Autistic and Verity in Truth

I am only posting the following to be useful to I-Integral who could use the following advice: not to tear down Wilberian theory, but to offer suggestions which I hope will be considered by the I-Integral Movement. to bring it current to the 21st Century.... I do not mean to suggest in... Read More

Six-Point Perspective and Beyond as Examples of Integral Art

When I say that "curvilinear perspective is an example of Integral art," I'm not suggesting that all Integral art should be based on curvilinear perspective but only pointing out that this technique represents a significant departure from linear or rectilinear... Read More