Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
HolonsNetwork
I've taken a version of one of Brian O's babies, or Trialectic economics to the HolonNetwork... (note: there are three parts and a forth one to be put up shortly)
It would be very nice if Brian himself would get more attention from the youngsters. I'm really trying to get Kurt to interview him on either this topic or his scientific views. Anyway, if your interested, here is my take on a trialectic economics - it is slightly different from Brains vision - but I hope we can find the right forum to get more attention behind a system like this and in so doing iron out some of the bugs and areas of slightly differing views.... Anyway, in hopes of co-creating a brighter future together!
Blessings, B
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Response to Carey
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Brent Simpson in response to Slightly differing views?Hi Carey,
I was not the individual that removed the posts. I did get your message about that and meant to respond but forgot & I apologize for that!!
As I note in the videos, I do take your word that in some real sense, at present, the logics are not perfect within this expression of the system. I have been working on a theory called Quadratic development and Brian O' I don't think agrees with this theory. But could well play a role in the Trialectics system. In its essence, I am arguing that there is a parallel between the quadrants and development. Namely, that we have primary focus within particular quadrants as we grow... this pattern would in some real sense reach back into the animal realm and even, i think, into the plant domain.
To clarify, on earth (in general agreement with academic theories and integral) it took about thirteen billion years to develop impulsive beings. These beings can subjectively fulfill their own needs (without self-reflexivity) notice that the transition from the first forms of life until the development of reptiles was one of increasing mobility. Until, with the rise of reptiles, there is a degree of mobility and self-direction that had never been possible with beings on the planet up to that point (including mobility in both water and land). Although there is some degree of inter-subjective relations within the reptilian species it is minimal (maybe 25% of the reptiles focus arguably) with about 50% on fulfilling impulsive needs as a primary focus. (although all four-quadrants are ever-arising)
With the evolution of birds, you're seeing a hybrid between reptiles and mammals. I'd argue that they are now in the subjective-space of the new inter-subjective domain (flocking patterns ect... some of these patterns are seen in late reptiles). When you see the rise of the mammals proper they are express inter-subject, inter-subjectivity as a primary focus. With late mammals you are seeing the development of early self-awareness (again expressing approximately 25% pattern of the level higher self-reflexivity - I would say that infra-red is also a mature expression of this. As some developmentalists note that when a magical-thinker puts on a mask of an animal they may think they have taken on the identity of that animal. They are transiting to the self-reflective stages of development or objective realm as a primary focus. So this shift has added inter-subjectivity to the list... this being can now express a form of both subjectivity and inter-subjectivity.
When RED comes online the individual has developed through the domains of reptiles subjective impulsivity (reptilian brain-stem), mammals inter-subjectivity (limbic system) and now activated early become self-reflexive proper, or early objectivity (from a subjective gaze). Amber adds inter-subjectivity within the domain of objectivity and Orange is the expression of objective-objective or, the summit of humanness in a sense. Green is the beginning realization of a new way of being (interpreted from an objective worldspace). That higher worldspace is inter-objectivity. This is the beginning understanding of the requirement and/or denial of something higher than individuated autonomy. this realization paradoxically arises from the expressions in and through the creations made by ones self-reflexive autonomy (i.e. objects created by the objective lens of the human being). Teal and higher leap into this space that is yet properly online as a whole system/understanding - the noosphere) In other words those leaping into 2nd tier are leaping into a space that is radically in the process of being created by mental now inter-objectively autonomous beings -they can minimally feel-into others. The coming online of this realization, if this pattern is right and holds, would starting in the techno-noosphere would be a subjective expression of the inter-objective domain. (Through felt-sense impulsive-like connection to all? beings). While maintaining ones autonomy as an individuate self-sense... that is capable of reasoning. This system would add some new element to the process of becoming if the pattern holds and that pattern would be at play presently but go unseen by the eyes of humans at this time. Just as reason is above the heads of mammals.
How this could connect to Triacletics, is that i feel Trialectics is a very good expression of the mind realm (as it accounts for subjectivity, inter-subjectivity and objectivity or core, head and heart) or the real big three humans are capable of fully expressing. If I am right about this process of development than the inter-objective pattern itself will almost naturally evolve onto (over top of) this existing pattern when the next beings reach Inter-Objective, inter-objectivity... and before to some extent but the full expression would come I believe at that point. So, in other words, this logic is incomplete because in part, the universe itself from our perspective is incomplete - its a process and I feel this may well be a step forward in this process (IMO).
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Who deleted the posts?
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Carey Butler in response to Response to CareyMore later about what you wrote, but I had to ask this question first because I am seeing it all over this web site. Who is making these deletions?
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted March 17th, 2011 by admin in response to Who deleted the posts?Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Batman is deleting messages
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Carey Butler in response to [Comment Deleted]Why does Batman do this?
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Great question!
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to Batman is deleting messagesI might not have thought to ask!
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted March 17th, 2011 by admin in response to Who deleted the posts?Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
I am not
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to [Comment Deleted]specifically
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted March 17th, 2011 by admin in response to I am notPlease Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
then
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to [Comment Deleted]go for it!
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 2 members found this useful.
Slightly differing views?
Posted March 17th, 2011 by Carey ButlerWhat about the issues in the Trialectics is not a viable logic system thread on this web site that are not yet being dealt with? Even some of those who should and could be clearing this issue up are removing their posts and not answering their mails!
These are not just "slightly differing views", these are fundamental issues needing to be cleared up.
I am not criticizing your work! I think I believe in what you are doing. I admit that I need time and your help to understand what you guys are doing.
My most important concern is that you realize how dangerous a system is that bases itself on Hegelian Dialectic. These types of dialectics were designed particularly to provide a philosophical justification for all of the needless suffering we see in our world.
Of course there is suffering that occurs naturally on its own, but the majority of suffering we experience in the world has been and is being artificially created.