Please Log in to Vote.

4 out of 4 members found this useful.

The Shrewd Business Manager...

With recent blogs on IL about the ethics of making a profit out of spiritual experience, the seamless return of a once slandered spiritual teacher and some related flip flops and accusations by a now ex IL blogger... I thought it appropriate to post an excerpt on the Parable of the Shrewd Business Manager from a book I'm working on called the Paradoxical Secret: The Authentic Teachings of Jesus... or something like that... It's a parable (short story) that speaks directly to some of these issues, but in a very intuitive or enigmatic way, while possibly raising some holy hell in the process...

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

The Shrewd Business Manager, Luke 16:1-8 

1Jesus told his disciples: "There was a rich man whose manager was accused of wasting his possessions. 2So he called him in and asked him, 'What is this I hear about you? Give an account of your management, because you cannot be manager any longer.'

3"The manager said to himself 'What shall I do now? My master is taking away my job. I'm not strong enough to dig, and I'm ashamed to beg— 4I know what I'll do so that, when I lose my job here, people will welcome me into their houses.'

5"So he called in each one of his master's debtors. He asked the first, 'How much do you owe my master?'

6" 'Eight hundred gallons of olive oil,' he replied.
      "The manager told him, 'Take your bill, sit down quickly, and make it four hundred.'

7"Then he asked the second, 'And how much do you owe?'
      " 'A thousand bushels of wheat,' he replied.
      "He told him, 'Take your bill and make it eight hundred.'

8"The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light.

 

Often regarded as the most puzzling of all the parables, this short narrative also gives voice to the same deep structure that resides at the radical center of all of Jesus’ most recognizable teachings while again frustrating our everyday expectations about what it means to enter the Kingdom with subversive twists and enigmatic turns.

 

In essence, this parable of Jesus is the paradoxical story of a subordinate (manager) outwitting his superior (rich man/master). The rich man’s manager is a swindler who wastes his masters’ goods and possessions, and is immediately dismissed from his position. This same manager further perpetuates his fraudulent behavior by cancelling the agreed upon amount of the masters debtors,[1] and in a final, unanticipated turn of events, the dishonest manager ends up being commended by his master for his astute judgment and his inventiveness under stress.

 

The central scandal of this narrative – the master’s praise of the dishonest action of his steward, has perplexed and bewildered many parable scholars. The approval of the master cuts against the sense of justice that prevails in the everyday social world and undermines our expectation that the master would respond with anger and condemnation when he becomes aware that he has been taken for a ride by his subordinate. But when the shrewd manager turns his hopeless situation around by using his wits to make friends with his master’s debtors and reducing the size of their debts – so that they will take him in after his dismissal, his master can only marvel at what he has done to save himself from total disaster.[2]

 

The rich man’s manager is indeed a dishonest rascal, but one who acts with grace under pressure, and so in one of Jesus’ most shocking paradoxes the sacked manager is actually commended for being so clever in worldly affairs – even as he takes a moral holiday at the master’s expense.[3] And where the master’s sanctioning of such dishonest behavior runs in direct contradiction to ones expectations of punishment, this amoral reversal – from judgment to forgiveness, is itself definitive of the original teachings of Jesus as a whole and can therefore be considered to stem from the authentic voiceprint of this 1st century sage from Galilee.

 

So again, there is a paradox at the heart of this parable: the rich man’s manager is abruptly sacked for being a fraud, just as his fraudulent response to this sudden crisis is held up as an example of good management and spiritual discernment. In Jesus’ true paradoxical style: what appears to be the respected manager of a rich man is really a swindler who loses his master’s possessions, and what appears to be a fraudulent swindler in his dealings with the rich man’s debtors, is really an applauded business manager who is much admired for his shrewdness. Or put simply: a manager is condemned as a fraud just as this fraud is praised as a manager.

 

There is also another paradoxical reversal disclosed in the narrative structure of this parable which further points to the radical message of Jesus and his preaching on the Kingdom of God. Essentially, the rich man - the privileged agent in this parable, in ruthlessly sacking his manager is represented in villainous terms as a ruthless and judgmental man, whereas the shrewd manager, the apparent victim or the rich man’s anger, is seen to be a successful rogue - the hero of the story, as one who is opportunistic in a crisis and thereby comes out on top.[4] The paradoxical reversal, where the upright master is ‘bad’ and the dishonest steward is ‘good’, overturns the assumed value-hierarchy and shifts the meaning of victim and perpetrator in another one of Jesus’ radical language-events: for where the business manager at first seems to be a victim of the rich man’s arbitrary will, he is really the perpetrator of justice, while the rich man at first seems to be the perpetrator of justice he is really the victim of the shrewd action of the business manager.

 

When the perpetrator becomes a victim, and the victim becomes a perpetrator everything is turned upside down and the hearers of Jesus’ enigmatic tale now have no way to navigate their world; its established co-ordinates have been shattered. Is the rich man cruel or way too kind? Is his shrewd manager a hero or a villain?[5] Over and again in these parables, when our horizon of expectancy collides with the narrative structure of Jesus’ explosive teachings, we are called to redefine the meaning of our lives as the arresting shock of Jesus’ unexpected reversals subverts conventional wisdom and challenges the way that justice operates in the social consensual world. For in this parable, Jesus’ breaks the bonds between power and justice that constitute conventional notions of morality, so that “the victim’s power as a rogue is clearly greater than the supposed power of the rich man as a dupe.”[6] Cutting against the grain of our taken for granted assumptions, Jesus now equates justice with vulnerability and power with powerlessness, for where both the rich man and his manager have their integrity put into question they both exhibit the capacity to act graciously under pressure. And in collapsing any meaningful value-hierarchy between the upright master and his degenerate steward, the advent of the Kingdom of God is also a great leveler...

 

There is one final paradox here that also breaks open the structure of ordinary expectations, for at the end of this parable a distinction is made between the children of this age (wordly/profane), who are clever in arranging business affairs for themselves, and the children of the light (otherworldly/sacred) whom simply do not compare in worldly wisdom and resourcefulness.[7] With another characteristic reversal of meaning, Jesus’ says here that seeming shrewdness in worldly affairs, is really a form of spiritual discernment, and seeming spirituality of the ‘people of the light’, is really a kind of irrelevant and childish naiveté in terms of the resourcefulness that is required for dealing with business in the world.

 

Shot through with shocking paradoxes, this parable is not so much a puzzling story about the sanctioning of immorality but an unmistakably authentic communication from Jesus of Nazareth about how things happen in God’s domain. As is the case with all of Jesus’ authentic teachings, everything is turned inside out and upside down: fraudulent behavior is radical justice, the rich man’s cruel judgment shifts into an act of praise, the immoral villain of the story becomes an esteemed hero, the ruthless perpetrator becomes a powerless victim, a sudden crisis is an opportunity for creative action, the vulnerability of the shrewd manager is powerful, the upright master is powerless, Jesus champions a rebel over a king while those shrewd in worldly affairs are spiritually awake...

 

The paradoxical stories of Jesus do not make things make sense - they perplex, confound and unsettle us with an altogether new figure of reality in which our cherished assumptions and presuppositions are regularly put into question... These parables express Jesus' passion for the impossible with an “infinite qualitative intensification and an immediate and pressing demand” (Caputo).

 

All of which means I am hanging on by a prayer, and that I am made adequate only by a confession of my inadequacy, by a confession of the poverty of my philosophy and the weakness of my theology. I am praying to be able to pray, for what better prayer, what better reason to pray, than when we are lost and left without a prayer?

Thanks for reading

Cameron

ww.camfreeman.com

 



[1] Scott 1990, p.259 In Palestine a steward customarily made a profit by adding a share for himself of any debt owed to his master, so that in reducing the size of the debt owned to the master is a sign of repentance in a time of judgment. (Scott 1990, p,258)
[2] Hultgren 2000, p.150-51
[3] Scott 1990, p.263
[4] Scott 1990, p.263
[5] Scott 1990, p.266
[6] Scott 1990, p.266
[7] Hultgren 2000, p.152

 

 

Please Log in to Vote.

2 out of 2 members found this useful.

Shrewdness

Barbara Green, in “Like a Tree Planted”, An Exploration of Psalms and Parables Through Metaphor, also examines the parable of the shrewd manager.

She introduces a number of interesting facts for consideration.

Although the manager has been accused of something serious, we are not told whether he has been wrongly or justly accused.

We do not know whether he has been given the opportunity to defend himself.

He does not attempt to speak up so we are not aware of what his own sense of the situation is.

There is moral ambiguity.

“The manager may well have conceived his own evil and dug his own pit, may be faced now with consequences of what he has perpetrated himself.  But it is equally possible that he is innocent, falsely accused, too powerless to hope to survive the charge levelled at him suddenly like a flaming arrow shot at a dry house.  I suspect we are prone to prejudge him guilty, but he may be less totally in the wrong than we assume.  The text does not specify the matter with any precision.  Innocence and guilt mingle ambiguously once again.  His situation is in any case precarious.”

In the light of all the issues mentioned at the beginning of your post, this paragraph is a reminder to me of how quickly and easily we judge situations without necessarily knowing all the facts.  It also points to the fact that often we can be caught in situations where regardless of our innocence or guilt, only one thing is left for us to do if we are to survive – act quickly and act prudently.

Often we act too quickly with the result that we react instead of respond.  Not often do we always act prudently.

This act of shrewdness (isn’t it strange how this word most has a negative connotation in modern day usage) is what is being commended by Jesus.

We don’t know whether the sacked merchant in the parable subtracted simply his own commission or his master’s profit.  His reason might be survival or in part revenge.

What is most relevant is the way he acts in the crisis he finds himself in.  He copes with the situation he finds himself in, in the same way he has already lived his life.  In his case, he acts within the set of relationships that have made up his life’s work.

The emergency procedures put into place are not radically different from what he has done before.

Herein lies the challenge.  Do we have a fixed picture of what a “moral universe” should be? When last have we challenged that picture?  Are we waiting for a higher power to intervene?  Are we in our everyday lives, learning to live with opponents visible and invisible?

Are we being resourceful in coping with what life brings our way?