Please Log in to Vote.
5 out of 6 members found this useful.
More Housekeeping: DO NOT DELETE YOUR POSTS AND COMMENTS
Hey everyone,
We have received many complaints from many different people about all the comment and post deletions taking place in the Integral Life community. We have asked several times that you DO NOT DELETE YOUR POSTS unless absolutely necessary. It is extremely disruptive to the community as a whole, and leaves many discussions tattered and stripped of all context, which dramatically reduces the value of the community for everyone who is here to participate.
If you say something today that you are not comfortable with people seeing tomorrow, please consider not saying anything at all. Remember, this is not just your personal space for self-expression, it is also a shared space that belongs to the entire Integral community. So please support the ongoing vitality of this community and stop deleting blog posts and comments.
Thank you,
Corey
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
deleted photos
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Ambo Suno in response to and some things need to be deletedHi Corey and others - when I have deleted my post or a thread when I placed some personal and family photos and realized that I didn't want them archived - for my own reasons. I think I won't place the personal photos in the first place in the future.
Onward,
amboPlease Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
totally fine Ambo
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Corey deVos in response to deleted photosHey Ambo,
That is an example of a totally appropriate reason to delete a post--as opposed to "I was finished with the conversation, so I deleted everything I contributed". Of course, in many of these cases a simple edit will also do the trick. And for the record, it is generally good online etiquette to leave a note about any substantial edits that you've made. I would say the same thing about deletions--if you absolutely need to delete a comment, instead of pressing the delete* button, hit *edit, delete your text, and leave a note about why you did so.
--
Corey W. deVos
Editor, Writer, Producer
Integral Life
Managing Editor
KenWilber.com
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
"Active Members" and other broken technologies
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Corey deVos in response to and some things need to be deletedYeah, our "active members" aren't so active.
This page is also on it's last legs--fortunately the left-most column seems to be working just fine. We are going to be improving our community technology in significant ways in coming months--I can't say much more about this right now, but I just want to acknowledge that our technology can sometimes be just as disruptive as anything else, and we are working hard to enhance our community platform in the near future.
--
Corey W. deVos
Editor, Writer, Producer
Integral Life
Managing Editor
KenWilber.com
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by admin in response to "Active Members" and other broken technologiesPlease Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Yes, extremely disruptive.
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Corey deVos in response to [Comment Deleted]Gestapo's and totalitarianism--why, when trying to enforce some basic, common-sense community rules, does the slope to Godwin's Law suddenly become so slippery? Yes, I agree with the basic premise that "people want to be free." But people also want stop signs, traffic lights, and basic forms of etiquette to prevent online discussions from feeling like a ghost town just a few days after they started.
Look, if you feel the to ritually delete your own threads--blogs that you create--then go for it. At least when you do that, the entire post is completely deleted, and does not leave pockmarks and out-of-context jetsam littered throughout the community. But please do not delete comments you post to other people's threads. Yes, it seriously diminishes the overall experience of the community. If you feel that you cannot abide by this guideline (sorry, MANDATE) then the solution is simple: do not post comments in other people's threads.
Think of it this way: when you participate with someone else's post, you are essentially going into their home and joining the party they are hosting. You can stand on the lawn, hang out, and talk to anyone you want. And you can also exit whenever you want--but you can't dig a hole in the lawn or punch a hole in the wall when you leave. Which is an apt metaphor for what happens when you delete your comments in someone else's thread.
Or, if this helps: when you comment on someone else's thread, you are implicitly entering a multi-perspectival, co-creative, mutual space with whomever is hosting and participating with that discussion. You are officially "On the Air with Larry King" (or Annie or Stanley or Stefano or Mary Linda or whomever might be hosting the thread). You can say whatever you want on the air, but you cannot demand that Larry stop running the footage after you walk off the stage.
And yes, it is sometimes appropriate to request privacy, which is what I am getting from your "recording devices" metaphor. But an explicitly public space like the Integral Commons is not the place. We have a private messenger for that, and I encourage you to use it for discussions that you would like to keep out of the public eye.
And whatever your assumptions about how many people have complained about this problem, you should know that they are many, that I am one of them, and that we have been receiving complaints about the negative effects this has on community cohesion for years now. This is not about "goading people into polite integral behavior." It's about trying to promote behaviors and guidelines that best serve the ongoing health and vitality of this community.
But seriously, can we stop with the MANDATES and GESTAPOS and TOTALITARIANISM? This isn't a Tea Party, this is a conversation about how to make this place as healthy as possible. At this rate, I am expecting someone to post a picture of me with a Hitler mustache. As of now, the rampant number of deleted posts is seriously diminishing the health of the community, so I am asking you all to please respect each other's discussions enough to keep yourself from littering them with anonymous [comment deleted] posts.
--
Corey W. deVos
Editor, Writer, Producer
Integral Life
Managing Editor
KenWilber.com
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
ownership
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to Yes, extremely disruptive.if someone initiates a conversation, does it seem reasonable to declare that person responsible for the entirety of the conversation, including every person's choices and method of participation? I think that such responsibility would come with ownership, in theory, and it seems unreasonable to me. This is a medium in which it is possible to refine our particular collaborative mark makings. It is possible to take things back, as a gesture of whatever, or to leave some space for creative interpretation later. There are other ways, sure, true. That happens to be one. For what purpose would we require records of our conversations? (Not that it isn't sometimes fun to re-visit them; it is; in my opinion and experience it is often even more fun to do so when there has been some change made to respond to.) Some times erasure is the most effective way to create a space or opening or to clear space or whatever for something else to emerge.
The concept of people owning conversations seems ridiculous to me, in certain ways. As I sort of said before, ownership implies responsibility. The degree of ownership is also the degree of responsibility for. I might claim authority over my contribution to a conversation, which comes with the right to change it, sure, yes, of course - also perhaps with the creative call to use it to maybe make a conversation move or be harmoniously cohesive or whatever.
If someone lays down a plank, and someone else puts - say- bricks on it or something, and someone else does also &c. till a house is built, does the house 'belong' to the person who put the plank on the ground?
If a record is precious to someone, that is fine - people sometimes get emails with everyone's contributions, as I understand.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
P.S.
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to Yes, extremely disruptive.if anyone happens to want to preserve some conversation, but doesn't know where to put it, feel free to add it here as a comment. I won't delete it.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Sometimes the best metaphore is no metaphore
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by DTataryn in response to Yes, extremely disruptive.Nicely said Corey (Yellow chastises Green for calling it Red-Amber).
I think that the historical definition of `forum`with posts and comments is enough to make it clear why its inappropriate to delete them after they have been posted and responded too. If someone wants to participate in a transient conversation with no long term records they should be in a chat room or in a group phone call or something of the like. One of the strengths of a forum is the ability to search archives and read what others have said on a topic and what conclusions were reached and why. I do it all the time, occasionally here, but certainly on other forums. And if I then feel I have something to contribute, I`ll post to a thread that`s been `dead`for a few months or even years, and our collective knowledge grows. You just cant do that with a telephone call or a chat room conversation.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
SD
Posted June 4th, 2011 by Jennifer Grove in response to Sometimes the best metaphore is no metaphoreSD can be very useful for sorting out Objects such as behaviors of groups or individuals and ourselves. But it is increasingly becoming more and more problematic to use it to put people into boxes. I've done it. I've held myself back from doing it. I've succeeded. I've failed.
I'm not sayin' you're doing it. I'm just lettin' ya know. SD Fights are cyclical here. People get hurt.
There are such forces in play, however. Your observations are most prolly correct to some degree. And it will be extremely complexified by the state of the Group. Some individuals will only act in connection with or reaction to others. Others only act independently. Many will switch back and forth. And you have to really get to know people to know who is who and what they're really doin' at any given time.
Add to that that there are only a few who have enuf Self-awareness to understand why they do what they do in the first place. Everyone has a rationalization. But few know how to find the real motivations. Those who have less self-awareness project more. Getting to know who is who takes time.
Over and under all of that is the idea that they are all doing what is natural and consistent with the needs of their egos. Eliminating egos will not be necessary, but managing them so that individuals do not destroy the peace and productivity of the Group will be.
I've found SD and other Developmental models helpful when we need to understand what individual and group ego needs are and how to care for them. The needs that people seem to have are for connectivity, commitment, safety, freedom, privacy, and some other things. It's going to be interesting to see if we can find something that will work for everyone.
I like your list of other social media forms. Each form has different purposes and meets different needs. This community is in a rough patch right now where there are just too many conflicting needs and only one crippled format to meet them. I don't know how we're gonna do it.
--
"The Left Hand Path, not merely the Right ... must take the lead."
~SES pg. 148
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
addendum
Posted June 4th, 2011 by DTataryn in response to SDThanks for the heads up Jen. I`ll clarify that I really dont mean that phrase to be disrespectful, and I`m not calling the author any names or trying to be derogatory. The interaction per se however is apparently a great example of the dynamic as far as I can see. My apologees to the author if it was taken pejoratively, it was meant more like `fascinating`. I`m off to golf or I`d say more.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
No Prob
Posted June 5th, 2011 by Jennifer Grove in response to addendumThanks for adding your Voice. This is like a big Family Meeting. The more honest feedback, the better.
LOL Welcome to the Family.
--
"The Left Hand Path, not merely the Right ... must take the lead."
~SES pg. 148
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Power
Posted June 4th, 2011 by Jennifer Grove in response to Yes, extremely disruptive.- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
The medium
Posted June 4th, 2011 by stefanoSome rooms it is OK to walk around naked in, and some it is not, for example, the doctor's consultation room versus the doctor's reception. The only difference is what the room has beed designated for.
You're just clarifying what these forums are designated as, in terms of formality, record, etc.
If a bunch of heavy metal rockers turn up at Betty's Tea Rooms they can certainly come in; they are expected though to make quiet chit chat and enjoy their cream cakes. It isn't a affront to their heavy rocker ethic, and many old ladies would probably like nothing more than chat to a gruff biker, it is just how that establishment is designated.
It could be designated for some other purpose, but you kinda just have to choose one.
People can note that email mailing list forums, and many web forums, don't have any delete button.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 4th, 2011 by admin in response to The mediumPlease Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 4th, 2011 by admin in response to [Comment Deleted]Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Sig?
Posted June 4th, 2011 by stefano in response to [Comment Deleted]Well I dunno that you're going to win against the IL team by claiming they're only interested in their own image.
Looks like a proportion of forum users are themselves complaining about the deletions.
I guess some people see the threads as more like a letter in the post, and others as more like a phone call.
Seeing as people themselves are generating the complaints, the "letter in the post" people, maybe those who prefer the "phone call" usage can pop something in their signature (you can set it in your profile) just to forewarn people not to expect stuff to stick around.
This comment is intended as brief and short lived, and may be deleted.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 4th, 2011 by admin in response to Sig?Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
%
Posted June 4th, 2011 by stefano in response to [Comment Deleted]I can't verify the one percent thing, but yeah it seems a mixture of needing technical solutions, with needing to handle different people's expectations. Some very big forums just don't have delete buttons, and some do. I can find stuff I wrote online ten years ago because it is still there and can't be deleted.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 4th, 2011 by admin in response to %Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
i guess it's about connection
Posted June 4th, 2011 by Shikha Sabharwal in response to [Comment Deleted]Beauty and Justice are connected through the cycles of longing.
There's a lot to be said but I
g u e s s j u s t know that there's a lot to be
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Preview
Posted June 5th, 2011 by stefano in response to [Comment Deleted]So what's your technical solution to people feeling that a thread is swiss cheese?
Because if it was up to me I'd probably just add a "preview" button, and remove the "edit" and "delete" buttons. Giant forums like Slashdot work like that, you can preview your comment as much as you like to make corrections, but once you click submit it goes into the thread and is fixed.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Blogs = Personal Space
Posted June 5th, 2011 by Jennifer Grove in response to PreviewStefano said:
"So what's your technical solution to people feeling that a thread is swiss cheese?
Because if it was up to me I'd probably just add a "preview" button, and remove the "edit" and "delete" buttons. Giant forums like Slashdot work like that, you can preview your comment as much as you like to make corrections, but once you click submit it goes into the thread and is fixed."
Forums = Public Space
Using Blogs as forum posts is weird and I've never seen it done anywhere else. Separating them would be better. That way a Blogger has control over their own environment and can choose various settings such as who can and can't view their posts, whether comments are turned on or off and whether or not they can be deleted and by whom. The Blogger's choice to review comments before they are published would be good as well. A "report" or "flag" button is mandatory and other types of tags may be useful for the blogger's own reference also. It may be useful to be able to track the stats of Blogs. # of Views is a common statistic that is out in the open in some blogs and pages. Maybe a member should be able to "Save" work that they've contributed to or are interested in as an archive. Once it's saved, that's it. There are many ideas that could help.
But for Forums, there should be different rules. Corey's right about a Blog being like someone's house and a Forum being more a public space. They are both shared spaces, but the shared value will have a different source. And just like there are different shared spaces in local worlds that have different rules of conduct, we could have different spaces in the cyber world. In the local world one should be quiet in a library and only speak when necessary and in a whisper. In the local world one should be quiet and listen to the speaker at an AA meeting. In the local world one should be attentive to the Teacher in a Classroom and then ask appropriate questions of them and not cross-talk. These are rules that we often learn without being told explicitly. Maybe we can create similar kinds of spaces in the Cyber-space. I've asked the site designers who are doing the next site if they can add a chat feature, much like FB has, so that real-time conversations can happen. I've also thot about a special Skype account that each member can either pay-per-use or pay a flat membership fee to cover the cost of that would bring real-time video/chat sessions into use for many purposes. There are so many options that can be created if people are just willing to do the work.
The Lower Left validity claims are:
- justness
- cultural fit
- mutual understanding
- rightness
Each kind or type of space can have different rules according to their purposes. We manage this in our local worlds without too much trouble. I don't think it's too much to ask that we accommodate the values of others out here. If someone doesn't like the rules in a particular space, they don't have to go there.
But for now, in the site as it stands today, if someone really wants to preserve the continuity of a conversation, they can copy/paste the body of the comment they are responding to into the text-box for their response - as I did above. I get to keep the context I want and you can claim that I'm lying later if you don't want proof of what you said scattered willy-nilly all over cyber-space.
--
"The Left Hand Path, not merely the Right ... must take the lead."
~SES pg. 148
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Different spaces
Posted June 5th, 2011 by stefano in response to Blogs = Personal SpaceYes I agree. Before I'd seen your post I'd just posted this morning suggesting having a chat room also, as I think the people who want to chat more informally (and not have a permanent record kept), have a valid point.
As we're international across timezone then maybe have the chatroom history available for say 14 or 30 days or whatever.
Plus as you say they could revisit the nuances of the forum format and the blog format and tune the level of controls.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 5th, 2011 by admin in response to Different spacesPlease Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
well
Posted June 5th, 2011 by stefano in response to [Comment Deleted]we still want the computer to preserve the messages for a while, be it one day or one month or one year.
how people deal with loss, etc. is infused into everything i guess.
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 5th, 2011 by admin in response to wellPlease Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted June 5th, 2011 by admin in response to [Comment Deleted]Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Scale
Posted June 5th, 2011 by stefano in response to [Comment Deleted]Yeah, and y'all notice I stretched it as far as a year... I said nothing about immortality or eternity.
As I've said before, Japan alone posts 2 million comments a day to forums. What gets written here is read by all of like three people. It is about scale.
It is like security. Security could mean locking your back door, all the way to living inside a mountain at NORAD's Cheyenne complex. We're all quibbling over scale. Some people say leave the posts up for a few months, some say I'm deleting after a week. We're just trying to find an appropriate balance for the site.
If a conversation lasts about a couple of weeks because people keep dipping into it, then Corey's saying those people who are dipping back in would like to read the conversation. Maybe Corey would like any thread to remain in full so that if someone Googles "islamofascism" they'll get a hit to a conversation here. (heh)
I don't understand what you people's objection is to "neat and tidy" and why that makes you think of fascism and immortality projects. I mean seriously, the more extreme the argument you present, the less convincing a case you make.
Schalk, your argument that you as author own your works is as daft as those legal disclaimers that appear at the bottom of corporate emails. "You must delete this if received in error blah blah" They have no legal power. If someone sent the email out that's their own problem. Too late its on a dozen servers already. Good luck trying to control that.
I get the thing about preferring a phone call and it is like email. I never write in an email anything I don't mind being accidentally forwarded around the world. I just don't use the medium that way.
The forums are a medium and they could easily just remove the delete button, as is the case on other forums. So use the medium in its nature. Don't pretend the medium is something other than it is.
If you're so keen on people not being attached to your comments, why are you so keen on retaining control over them? Why are you so keen on retaining the delete option? You said something, who cares? Why the need to undo it?
I remember a psychologist telling me that the computer's "undo" feature was a sort of psychological crutch for people.
Of course by providing a delete button they've made it ambiguous.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
and some things need to be deleted
Posted June 3rd, 2011 by DTatarynHi Cory
I very much agree with your comments and have found deleted posts quite disorienting at times. In terms of housekeeping and presentation of the site, there is something that I think needs to be updated. While I haven`t checked a lot of them out, your `Active Members` list contains Author Gillard`s post from 2008. I`m not sure that`s a good definition of active, and if it is, it does not speak to well to the `activeness` of IL. It might be good to update your algorythms. Hope you are well.