Please Log in to Vote.

9 out of 9 members found this useful.

An Ode to Pop: Mysticism Wrapped in Cellophane

From CoreyWdeVos.com
 

I love pop culture.
 

Sure, I’m biased.  How could I not be? After all, this is the only culture I’ve ever actually known.
 

But still, allow me the ethno-centric space to proudly proclaim: pop culture is the most amazing cultural force the world has ever seen.
 

Never in history have we had such a comprehensive reflection of the human condition—whether you’d like to wade in the bubble-gum shallows or dive into the deepest esoteric waters, pop culture has it all, and it’s all waiting for you.
 

Pop culture does not seek to transcend the superficial, it revels in it.  It is mysticism wrapped in cellophane, sprouting from seeds planted deep in the heart of the American Tantra, and blossoming in recent decades as the world’s first truly global culture.
 

The ancients have descended from Olympus and taken up residence in the Hollywood Hills, trading their togas for the new regalia: blue jeans, black leather jackets, and black sunglasses—the perennial vestments of cool.  Make no mistake: these archetypal deities are alive and well in the 21st century, they’re just a little bit harder to see.  The gods of pop continue to shape our world and our thoughts, invisible patterns shining through a perpetual parade of actors, actresses, and musicians, enveloping us in a warm blanket of shared symbolism that ensures that we will always have something to talk about.
 

I wasn’t always so in love with pop culture.  I used to resent being born into an American mythos that seemed to me to have about as much depth as a thinly stretched sheet of saran wrap.  This was especially true as a younger man, back when it was more difficult to tease my own sense of identity apart from the media I surrounded myself with, afflicted with the same false sense of “hipper-than-thou” elitism that seems to plague so many immature aficionados.  I would stubbornly ignore and condescend pretty much anything that got pulled into the currents of the pop mainstream, turning my attention instead to the sounds of the underground—sounds that I would not only find to be far more interesting (which they were), but would also assist my own desperate struggle to feel cool (which they did), while convincing myself that the underground was somehow separate from the rest of pop culture and safely quarantined from the candy-coated surfaces of the mainstream (which it wasn’t).
 

But eventually, my tireless search for the ever-elusive “cool” began to flip itself inside-out, beginning in my late twenties when I discovered my new obsession with hip hop and the art of the DJ. 
 

When I acquired my first set of turntables, I was almost immediately confronted with my own naive elitism: “I’m only going to play integral music,” I told myself. Well, it only took a day or two to find the five-or-so albums that could even come close to meeting this nobly closed-minded standard, and it didn’t take much longer before I realized that there was something fundamentally flawed in my own aesthetic sensibilities. 
 

I eventually began to realize that it’s not so much the depth of the actual artistic expression that matters, but the depth of authenticity behind the expression that ultimately makes me shake my ass into oblivion.  This was the opening I needed, through which my own palette of artistic influences and inspirations would expand until it covered all space and all time.  The relentless quest for the sort of exclusivity I needed to prop up my own sense of separateness finally began to quiet, and a deep yearning for inclusivity began to trickle through.  I no longer wanted to play integral music; I wanted to play music integrally
 

Pop culture—this unholy union of capitalism, mass production, and artistic passion—suddenly revealed her true form to me, whispered her secrets into my ear, and showed me how to find limitless beauty in even the most superficial drips of gloss.
 

I often say that if understanding the depths and patterns of growth explored by integral theory doesn’t help you love more of the world, you’re obviously doing it wrong.
 

And it is as true for art as it is for human psychology.
 

If your own elite sense of aesthetics doesn’t help you see more beauty in the world, you’re doing it wrong.  After all, the superficial is not the enemy of the beautiful—it is beauty in its most accessible form. 
 

But God knows that doesn’t make it any prettier….
 

Continue to Part II: A Zeitgeist for Every iPod —>

 

Don't Miss

Top 40 Albums of the 00's (#31-40)

 

 

Related:

dj rekluse Music Page
(tons of free dj mixes)


The Church of Rock

Please Log in to Vote.

1 out of 1 members found this useful.

where's the grilled velveta sandwich with white wonder bread?

Corey - no image of spam and eggs? Where's the grilled Velveta sandwich with white wonder bread to go with the thin tomato soup?

I appreciate what you're saying here and the challenge of relinquishing speciallness and hip credentials of sorts.

I think that maybe this has been going on a little for me, now and then: "I often say that if understanding the depths and patterns of growth explored by integral theory doesn’t help you love more of the world, you’re obviously doing it wrong."

ambo

 

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

Amen, Corey!

"The superficial is not the enemy of the beautiful—it is beauty in its most accessible form."

Yes, Corey -- you said it so well!

I've got KC & the Sunshine Band on my iPod, and love taking walks to such tunes as "Keep It Comin' Love" ... (don't stop it now/ don't stop it no / don't stop it now / don't stop ...... don't let your well run dry, don't stop it now ... ), knowing it's really a prayer, a 20th century psalm, and I am contemplating-in-motion . . .

There is still just a little bit of a snob in me that is embarrassed to admit such things -- (a holdover from my wanna-be-hip -and-special days) but her voice grows weaker each day. And today, she's stopped totally in her tracks by your writing!

Cheers,

Mary

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

Seriously

Corey, you are seriously one of my favorite writers. Thanks for putting this together!

--

 david titterington

www.davidtitterington.com

www.davidtitterington.blogspot.com

Please Log in to Vote.

1 out of 1 members found this useful.

Franny and Zooey Go Pop

"I eventually began to realize that it’s not so much the depth of the actual artistic expression that matters, but the depth of authenticity behind the expression that ultimately makes me shake my ass into oblivion."  

Pop seems to be the new folk, and you're right, it's the folk mythos and ethos for a global culture, which is maybe why it has breadth but is always promising a depth that it never fully realizes without us bringing our individual mythos to complete it.

To your quote above, I would add that it's not just the authenticity behind the expression but the authenticity that we bring to receiving the expression.  I believe our depth is portable and can be moved from high to low culture and back again as often as needed; whereas, some of my friends would say that only high art can awaken that deeper expression of archetypical and mythic content in us, pointing us toward recovering a depth we didn't know we had.  So, which comes first: being able to receive the depth brought out in response to a level of authenticity in the popular experience and thereby recovering the true depth?  Or, recovering the true depth first so that we can bring it to the popular?  I suspect that the actual answer is something like it doesn't really matter because depth is always seeking ground.  I teach a lot of 18/19 year olds who are steeped in the heart of this culture, and I think there have been some side effects of too much popular culture before depth--namely, the unwillingness on their part to delay gratification that leads to spiritual growth and engagement... many of them have never seen the rewards of sustained thought, rereading, critiquing.  But, all of those curmudgeonly complaints on my part will not erase the fact that the popular culture will still contain the archetypes of their collective growth dilemmas and will perhaps arise as needed to balance the superficial engagement many kids seem to have with the world.  That would be part of the evolution of Spirit, I suppose.  Thanks for your well-written post.

 

 

--

 “Wisdom tells me I am nothing. Love tells me I am everything. Between the two my life flows." Nisargadatta Maharaj