Please Log in to Vote.

15 out of 15 members found this useful.

The Singularity: Rupture or Rapture?

 
Share

 

There is an old proverb often used as an analogy for technological growth, about an ancient emperor of China and the inventor of chess. According to the story, once the emperor became aware of the game of chess, he sent a message throughout the kingdom seeking to reward its inventor, offering anything within his power to give for such an exceptional game. Upon meeting the emperor, the inventor, a poor peasant farmer, thanked the emperor for his generosity, and proceeded to place a single grain of rice in the first square of a chessboard. He then placed two grains in the second square, four in the third, eight in the fourth, etc., doubling the number of grains for each of the chessboard's 64 squares.


At first the emperor was fairly amused by the farmer's request—after all, these were mere grains of rice we were talking about, how much could he possibly lose? So he allowed the farmer to continue. It wasn't until they got about halfway through the chessboard that the emperor began to notice that something didn't quite smell right in Shanghai. After 32 squares—32 successive doublings of a single grain of rice—the farmer was up to about four billion grains of rice, the equivalent of a few acres of rice fields. If they were to continue all the way to the end of the board, the farmer would be owed about 18 quintillion grains of rice, which would require a rice field twice the size of the surface of the planet to produce, oceans included.


From a single grain of rice to a quantity that more than quadruples the total biomass of the Earth, in just 64 steps—this is the nature of exponential growth. Because we are largely linear thinkers living in an exponential world, this sort of growth can be very difficult to comprehend—or to even perceive—at least until we are plunged headlong into the second half of the chessboard. Visually graphing this sort of exponential curve [y=2^(x-1), for the mathematically inclined] gives us some insight as to why this acceleration can be so easy to take for granted—for the first half of the curve, progress seems to move almost parallel to the horizontal x-axis, and the frequency of change can seem fairly negligible: from a few grains, to a few bushels, to a few acres, not amounting to much at all. But once we begin moving into the "elbow" of the curve—about 32 squares, in the case of our increasingly anxious emperor—we begin to see progress truly taking off, eventually becoming more closely parallel with the vertical y-axis.


So what does this anachronistically agrarian metaphor of grains of rice, Chinese emperors, and peasant farmers have to do with today's digital scurry?


According to Moore's Law, computational power is doubling every 18 months. Which means that the year 2000 marked 32 consecutive doublings since the invention of the transistor, while 2006 marked 32 doublings since the invention of the integrated circuit in 1958. We are now living on the second half of the chessboard—and from here on out, things get really crazy. Turing-approved artificial intelligence, cyborg brain/computer interfaces, nanotechnology, even the possibility of uploading consciousness to digital substrate—all of this "post-human" technology is now becoming increasingly feasible, and there is a very good chance we could see this (and more) achieved within most of our lifetimes.


This rate of acceleration currently shows no signs of slowing anytime soon—if anything, the rate of acceleration itself seems to be accelerating. (Some critics of Moore's Law believe that there must be a hard limit at the upper-end of this growth, as defined by the number of transistors you can physically fit upon a single slice of silicon, but others argue that our current technology will eventually be subsumed by a new computational paradigm, such as quantum computing, which will break through this "silicon ceiling.") Within the next 30 years we will be able to manufacture $1000 computers that are capable of as many calculations per second as the human brain. Following this trend as far as we can, we are taken to the limits of imagination itself. The sheer magnitude of our imminent technological progress is almost impossible to grasp, the implications and possibilities are too far beyond our experience to make any meaningful sense of, at least from our current coordinates in history.


This is what is meant by the "technological Singularity"—like a black hole in time, it represents a point in our not-too-distant future beyond which we simply cannot imagine. There is no going back, and there is no slowing down—there is only tomorrow's unfolding, a future pressing into the present through this thin veil of time, a world well beyond the visions of the world's most inspired mystics, prophets, and science fiction writers. But while some may rhapsodize about the approaching technological Singularity as some sort of mythic rapture, a kind of digital utopia in which the struggles that have long been at the core of the human condition find instantaneous resolve, there are many others who aren't so quick to think that we will all go up in light with the simple flip of a switch.


And while we could make the argument that technology is the single most influential arbiter of human development, technology does not actually determine human development. The internet, for example, while representing the legacy of some of the most cognitively advanced minds the world has ever seen, can be used by anybody—in fact, it has become a megaphone for everybody, including Nazis, religious fundamentalists, left-wing alarmists, and Ron Paul supporters. The same can be said for splitting the atom—anyone smart enough to actually build a nuclear bomb would be the least willing to detonate it, assuming their values are on somewhat equal footing with their cognitive intelligence. At every moment our world bears witness to the cruelties that occur when the inventions from higher altitudes are used by people at lower altitudes, whether that invention is a computer, an AK-47, or a democracy.


If anything, the Singularity promises to bring as much rupture as it does rapture. As technological evolution continues to accelerate, our identities, ideals, and values struggle to keep pace, increasing the gap between the hardware of technology and the software of consciousness and culture. Make no mistake: if it is to truly become the denouement of human evolution, a jumping-off point for an entirely new conception of human existence, the technological Singularity must be accompanied by a cultural Singularity and a conscious Singularity—a Singularity of "I", a Singularity of "we", and a Singularity of "it". Otherwise it will not be a Singularity at all, but a world-devouring monster at the end of history, threatening to send evolution in this tiny corner of the galaxy back thousands, if not millions of years.


Fortunately, we do see an analog to the technological Singularity occurring within consciousness and culture. Just as Moore's Law predicts that each successive technological innovation will take less and less time to emerge, we can actually see the same happening with cultural worldviews. For example, we can estimate a couple hundred thousand years of tribal cultures, ten thousand years of warlord cultures, a few thousand years of mythic traditional cultures, five hundred years of rational industrial cultures, and just over 50 years of pluralistic informational cultures, each new stage taking only a fraction of the time to emerge as the previous stage. We are now seeing a new stage of culture and consciousness beginning to emerge—a markedly Integral stage, capable of viewing the world through a meta-paradigmatic and multi-perspectival lens, holding all the world's knowledge, wisdom, and insight as a single living jewel. And as more and more Integral individuals come together, a powerful cultural force begins to sweep across the planet—one that is inherently more whole, more balanced, and more capable than anything the world has ever seen.


And to the extent that you are even vaguely interested in conversations like these, you are actually enacting and participating with the Singularity, at least in its conscious dimension. Today's Integral pioneers are the living ancestors of tomorrow's post-humans, standing in the convergence of all that is Beautiful, Good, and True. You are the Singularity, every breath rippling out to the edge of our shared future, echoing back as tomorrow's possibilities.



 
     
 

Corey deVos

Corey deVos is Editor, Writer, and Producer of Integral Life, as well as the Managing Editor of KenWilber.com. He has worked for Integral Institute since Spring of 2003, and has been a student of integral theory and practice since 1996. A collection of Corey's writings and "trans-genre" DJ mixes can be found on www.CoreyWdeVos.com. 

 
     
  MORE BY COREY DEVOS  
     
 

Dark Matter: A Soundtrack for Psychonauts

 
     
  HeartBeatZ: A Mix for Lovers  
     
  In Hot Water  
     
 

 

 

 
     
 

Whether you know it or not, you are an evolutionary artist. All of us are already participating in a great dance of creativity, each in our own unique way. Our journey as evolutionary artists touches every aspect of our lives—from the words we choose, to the beauty we create, to the love we make.

That's why we are truly delighted to invite you to Integral Spiritual Experience Year 3 | Awaken the Fire: Harnessing the Power of Your Evolutionary Creativity on December 28th, 2011 - January 1st, 2012, at Asilomar Retreat Center in Pacific Grove, California. Featuring some of the world's most leading-edge spiritual teachers, artists, activists, and visionaries, we will be joined by the integral evolutionary community from over 30 countries world-wide. And we want you to be a part of this extraordinary experience!

Register now with the code integral and receive an extra $50 off the early bird rate—a limited time offer, just for our Integral Life community!

 
     
 
     

 

Share

 

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

Territory and Telos - Boomeritis; A Rapturous Rupture

Corey,

Brilliant job. One of the best intros to the tech singularity I have yet to read.

In Boomeritis (novel), the bits about the singularity were particularly fascinating to me. When we increase our cognitive capacity and physical power a few orders of magnitude, how will we use that power? 

Robert McDonald told me that when he learned how to resolve grief in his clients, he was faced with a new question: should he? He was not faced with that moral question UNTIL he had the power to resolve grief. Morality is a function of our choices, and the more cognitive, physical, social power we get, the more important our moral development becomes.

How do we structure the moral path through the elevations so that a computer/human can pass through them efficiently? How do we encourage a mind to traverse the various levels and dimensions with alacrity and speed? 

One piece I have been working on towards this end is to recognize the difference between the Territory and the Telos. Once we lay out the integral landscape, once you have a map that somewhat adequately describes the territory, the question becomes, towards what telos/goal/destination do you travel?

What use is a map without a "You Are Here" and an "X marks the spot." I mean, who cares about a map without a treasure? 

What is the moral telos towards which we can orient? What is the whole we are integrating ourselves into? What is the integrity we can deepen or dis-integrate? What is the principle the cyborg intelligence can use to determine where to go?

Deeper/wider is a decent description of the journey from an after-the-fact perspective. All lines/levels/quads/types/states is descriptive, not normative. It is epistemology (understanding), not metaphysics (truth), nor morality (good), nor politics (just), nor aesthetics (beautiful). Non-duality is about HOW we experience the journey, not where to go, as integral has only begun to demonstrate. Up-spiraling is all good and well - AFTER you know what the spiral consists of. But that is not the challenge that we or the cyborg faces.

The question we face is: given where we are right now, our context (especially the fact that we do not know our future), what is our individual next step (in partnership with other individuals making similar choices)? Towards what guiding light do we orient ourselves? What principles guide us to the next leg of our journey? How do we navigate the troubled waters in front of us, and towards what?

We need a moral compass to guide us, not only a map. We need principles by which to self-transcend and recursively course correct, not only perspectives in which to categorize our experience for purposes of integration.

What are the optimal human values we can define with sufficient precision to create that recursive telostotic movement?

The trick to the singularity is not about speed or power or the veracity of our maps, but our telos, our destination, our fulfillment, our Thriving.

--

Mark Michael Lewis - The Thrive Coach - Know Your Purpose. Build True Wealth. Love the Journey. - http://GameOfThriving.com - http://OptimalHumanValues.com

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

Editing Information, My two cents worth or more

 Ken mentioned how important editing is during our information age. Both the concrete, particular, promise of each and every bit of information and a holistic summary of the myriad forms and massive quantities of the information are valued commodities to the evolving human being. One without the other is devalued or worthless. The editors get paid because they can produce what appear to be "meaningful" summaries. 

  On one hand, I feel that I invested my time wisely by listening to Ken's futuristic talk and by reading Corey's excellently written points about the vast difference between mere technilogical singularity and integral singularity. The details and tangents provided me several creative-thinking jumping off points. To the extent that I am able to recall some of my insights or connections which occured during various side trips in the listening journey, I will be able to evolve my world view and the effectiveness of my life's "staging area," or "center."  

 On the other hand, the complexity of both the talk and the writing makes my head spin. Plus, I forgot some of my insights, because there were so many trees that I lost sight of whole sections of the forest. Fortunately I think I do see the forest as a whole. I think I can edit the information enough to speak a digestible (although awfully familiar, and potentially stale) truth. If so, then my summary - my editing work -  below must be worth money (I sure need it!). Wouldn't it be worth more than the standard "two cents," which is the standard value designated for an opinion?  

Editor's comment: 

"Technology necessitates wisdom." 

 

Darrell

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

[Comment Deleted]

This comment has been deleted by the author.

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

nice

The rapture is the belief that the righteous will be removed before judgement on the world starts;

the rupture is what's prophesied to happen shortly before that event where a huge number of Christians desert their faith and their first love in Jesus Christ...

buying caverta online without prescription