Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Poem as a World, the first in a series about "Creation Crossover"
Dear IL folks, Recently, I have been participating in an integral blog, which, contrary to the first impression of its title ("Integral Sucks"), has been very constructive. The blog was posted by Rob Smith. He devoted it to gathering ideas that might improve the quality and reach of the Integral Life community. In a sense, the blog discussion is devoted to re-creating this integral collective experience. This collective is a a world within the (global) world.
I suppose we are talking "holons" here. A "world" seems to be a holon. Am I right about this point/distinction? The contents of the "world" would be the breadth, or spread, of a holon. The way that the world is included in larger worlds, or how it includes smaller worlds within it, would be the vertical view of a holon. But "holons" are a bit too abstract for most of us to relate to. "Worlds" are more "user-friendly" than "holons". Imagine the Seinfeild episode about "worlds colliding". Would the skit have worked if the characters said "when holons collide"?
Recently, a group of IL members have been pouring themselves into the "Integral Sucks" discussion, accepting it as yet another "world" within the world of IL. As the participants in the blog discussion open themselves up to the project of improving IL, the project not only has greater access (and potential influence upon) each participant's inner "world", but it must tap into those inner "worlds" if it is likely to succeed. The project itself depends on the "gifts" emerging from the self-hood - from the inner worlds - of the participants. In the process, the project begins to subtly re-shape of each participant's inner world. We are "growing" while "fixing", while attempting to solve problems which limit the potential of IL.
If the project succeeds, and the IL community's changes-for-the-better are made, then we will each ask ourselves "How will I fit in with the re-created IL?" In turn, that question will take the form of: "How will I be (What "shape" will I take?) in that new community, in that new creation.?" In this sense, as each participant strives to re-create the IL community, he/she is is re-creating herself or himself.
Each of these worlds were (and still are, as each is ongoing) acts of creation. A world can be viewed as a "creation". This puts a kind of theological twist to the "worlds", puts them in the light of a "Creator". From this perspective, you could say that the co-creation of the "Integral Sucks" blog/discussion "crosses over" from one creation to another, from blog to the IL community, and from blog to each participant's inner world, including (especially including!) her/his "gifts". Here, we have the world as the world, we have the Integral Life community as a world, we have the discussion "Integral Sucks" as a world, we have each participant's "world", and we have each participant's "gifts" - all of which are "creations".
Since the act of "re-creating" IL requires energy flow ( a bunch of little "i"s : insights, inputs, investments, and interventions, as well as big "I"s: the overall energy of a human being) from each of the above-listed "creations", then the IL improvement project requires what I call "creation crossover" - crossover from one creation to another.
One of the discussion threads in Integral Sucks was about "harvesting gifts" in the online community. Mark Dubois, proposed that we consider making the network like "FaceBook on steroids". If by that, he meant (and I think he did) that Integral Life could have a similar quality of networking by individual interests and hobbies and gifts (Where there is smoke there is fire. Where there are interests, there are gifts.), but centered around a deeper, steroid-like, more intellectually and spiritually challenging, overall discussion, then I wholeheartedly endorse that proposal. In fact, in the blog discussion, I already did wholeheartedly endorse that idea.
In one comment, I used my poetry writing as an example of an-as-yet-unharvested gift. I have shared some of my poems in Integral Life discussions, but it was more like squeezing them in than having a place for them to "speak". Also, when I shared my poems, no sub-community of other poets emerged. Non-the-less, I am thankful that several IL members took the time to read and appreciate the poems, and I came away feeling that there was a space (in the heart), if not a place, for poetry in the IL community. Is there a means to identify other Integral Life members who are interested in reading or writing poetry, or who may be interested in exploring Integral themes through poetry? Any poet/philosophers out there in Integral land besides me?
So, this current blog is an attempt to create a place, at least conceptually, for poetry in the IL community. The conceptual vehicle, or "frame" that I am using is the "world" thing that I started off with. Just as Integral Life is a creation, and you and I are creations, and the whole (larger) world (including the cosmos) is a creation, so is a single poem. It is both a creation and a world. What I hope to do here is to effect "creation crossover" by looking at the poem as though it were a world. The next step is to examine the characteristics of that world and see if it parallels some of the other worlds. Much of my inspiration for this exercise came from recently reading David Bohm's book Thought as a System. Change the word "thought" to "poem", and the word "system" to "world", and there you have it ! Here we are. And here is the poem-as-a-world, and poem as a reflection of the modern culture version of "world", that I want to share with you.
Drone
(as defined in Webster’s New World Dictionary)
Definition: a pilotless airplane that is directed in flight by remote control
"I like that blend.
Gotta ask 'em tomorrow morning,
'What was the coffee of the day yesterday?'
I assume Starbucks keeps a record of some sort.
Maybe I better stop on the way home
and find out before the day ends.
Can't count on corporate policy
covering me on this.
I'll buy a bag tonight,
whatever the name is,
grind it and brew it
here in the office,
sip it all day long
while I stare at the monitor.
Lets see, what are the destination coordinates
on that site sarge said to target?
Here they are.
There it is.
Drop everything.
Another one bites the dust.
Damn, this coffee is good.
Need a warm up.
I think it was a village or something.
What's next? Latitude... Longitude...
That could be a training ground.
Looks like a storage building right there.
Zoom in. Lock on.
Bombs away.
Huh,
too many bodies for a warehouse.
Three spots left.
One,
two,
three.
Damn, I'm good.
The king of the joy stick,
dirty fuckin' hair -trigger Harry,
nice and precise,
anyway you slice it.
This coffee is definitely on the cold side.
Done here. Program Danny Boy
to head home. I'll
nuke the rest of this cup,
Then I better stop, if I expect
to get any sleep tonight.
Can't drink it after 3 .
Wonder what time it is over there.
Good job, Danny boy.
There ya go, ease on down,
nice and easy does it.
Shut down your jets now,
let the crew hook up and
and haul your ass to the hanger.
Just like a stud horse,
you rode hard, now yer put up hot.
Speak of hot,
that's what I'm talkin' about!
A little strong though;
kinda leavin' a bad taste in my mouth.
Guess it has a shelf life.
Do I still wanna buy a bag?
Why not, won't hurt a thing.
The way we drink the stuff here,
won't be around long anyway.
Gotta have it. Keeps us wired for sound -
on auto pilot."
Definition: a male bee, as a male honeybee, which serves only in a reproductive capacity, has no sting, and does no work.
"Gotta have some of that.
thats where it's at"
buzz,buzz, buzz
Why, oh why?
just becuzz.
Some love to fly,
but, my, oh my, I
fly to love, I
love to love.
buzz, buzz, buzz,
just becuzz.
Don't need to know
no reason.
It's what I do.
Now's the season
of love,
love sweet as honey,
the reason
my season is oh so sunny.
Let workers work
their wings to the bone,
I'm a drone,
and drones, well ...
drones just don't do that,
don't carry loads as fat
as that.
I tilt my hat
to those who do.
They deserve a word or two
of praise
for all the work,
all the days
and days of work they've done.
But my job's fun,
It's not my place
to work, or run
a kingdom, let the Queen make rules,
I'll just make love.
I'll set the pace'
and put in place
a wide array of subtle tools -
a wink of eye, a touch of hand -
to woo my Queen
who rules the land.
See, I 'm one hellova lucky man -
bee, that is.
That's my biz.
buzz, buzz, buzz.
Definition: ... sustaining a single low tone, such a tone.
The dulcimer haunts him,
rings Appalacian songs
that roll like mist across
countless hills, between
forgotten people
who scrape meager livings
from rocky ground,
piecing shacks on lanky stilts
on difficultly-angled planes,
just hanging on,
hanging in there,
fragments of a people, sharing music
like a kindergarten's rope that
kids hold onto when crossing the
intersection and taking a field trip
in the community. The community
is woven into a rope of stories
droned out with a poor
man's bagpipe, with twangy chords
(vocal chords and dulcimer chords),
salty dog love tales, like dog's tails
swinging, singing hardships into
artful, heartful expression,
into soulful mists,
mystical half-knowns of droplets felt,
of lives lived,
forming one song that echoes through
hallows, across patches of
land and landscapes of being.
Bluegrass songs
stream
on the internet,
enhancing the workplace
where the young enlisted man,
stationed stateside,
is charged with operating
technologies reaching abroad -
a bird, a mechanical bird,
or big bee, a stinging bee,
or sword without the grasp
of human hand and heart,
an over-extension.
The only reason
it is bluegrass, is that
the young man likes it.
He was raised in eastern Ky.
The music reminds him of home,
clear across the country.
It brings a familiar touch, tone,
to his California post.
He especially likes the dulcimer's
drawn out, low, slow, buzz -
only hearing it peripherally,
almost subliminally, as he sips his coffee
and adjusts the monitor.
That night, after work
(after stopping by the nearest Starbucks
and buying something,
and after watching the Simpsons,
and American Idol,
and going to bed a little late
because he drank coffee at 3:30 that afternoon,
and finally getting to sleep,
a fitful, fragmentary, sleep,
but sleep, nonetheless),
he dreamed of grandma and grandpa.
© 2009 Darrell Moneyhon
Here we are, again. What did this world, Drone, say about larger world? Did the separate stanzas, frames, or worlds-within-the-poem-world, crossover from one another and converge? Is the poem, in that sense (in the sense of looking with separate, but related, frames), an "integral" poem? Does the poem say anything that might be applied to our current IL re-creating efforts?
I invite you to answer these questions in comments. Lets see if we can discern a "creation crossover" from poetry, to philosophy, to community-building, to self. It's a neat exercise. Feel up to it?
Thanks, Darrell
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
A Stab at analyzing the Poem along integral lines of thought.
Posted March 18th, 2009 by Darrell MoneyhonSince I have had no takers so far on the challenge of analyzing the poem in terms of intetral concepts/perspectives, I decided it was time for me to take a stab at it. Perhaps this will get the ball rolling on the "Integral Poem?" project.
After being away from the poem for some time now, I re-read and re-thought it. Here are some associations I made to integral concepts:
Gross Body = first section (the robotic, Starbucks-drinking, post modern culture participating, soldier operating the modern technology of a drone), Subtle body = second section (the dreamy bee), Causal Body (or some approximation toward it, via a glimpse, or "state") = third section. This section offers an emerging insight of a deeper pattern that allows for a sense of meaning which transcends particular segments of life and particular social roles. It transcends the boundaries of intimate family or community experiences and allows the spiritual self to take those experiences accross the boundaries of being a cultural participant in the post-modern era. The fact that the crossover is still barely beyond a subconscious level, rooted in the main charaters nighttime dreams, and only peripherally associtated to the conscious act of choosing to listen to Bluegrass music while doing his work assignment of operating a drone, doesn't take away from the fact that crossover is occuring. In that third stanza, the poem suggests that our human minds can find a way to integrate love and warmth (subjective, UL quad stuff) with the gross body's participation in a post-modern world's self-alienating (human-alienating) practices. The deeper, "real" me begins to walk through the"walls" of back-home relating and post-modern participation, like Casper, the friendly ghost.
In terms of quads, the first stanza seems located in the technical realm of either the UR or LR quadrants (or inyy both). The last stanza is spoken from an UL point of view, and seems to spiritualize or "mind-ify"the whole she-bang (the whole content of the overall poem). The second stanza (the lusty bee) seems to represent the lower left quadrant, in the sense that it seems an alegorical representation of the modern (post-modern) culture in which the consumer is caught up in gratifying comfort needs via use of the marketplace. It is interesting to note how much sex is used to sell the products in that marketplace, and then to compare that to the sexual "job" of the bee. In some ways the Queen is capitalizm, and the pleasure seeking drone bee is serving the queen via mindless consumerism.
Agree or disagree with any of these integral, or integral-like, interpretation of the poem? I challenge you to follow this lead, and to help me see poetry as a viable participant in the integral process.
Darrell