Please Log in to Vote.
3 out of 3 members found this useful.
Hear for yourself: William Irwin Thompson
Hi! In some previous discussions we have some polemic about this author
who is very critical of Ken Wilber and AQAL.
I was pointed to him by Shamansun, another I-Life member some months ago.
Here I leave you with the first 2 audios I heard from him, which I found in an original
blog post by Shamansun:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVsQ4givNgA#t=08m31s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDxr2otebYE&feature=related
I would appreciate a lot your comments on these.
Love,
Federico
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 2 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted August 14th, 2010 by adminPlease Log in to Vote.
3 out of 3 members found this useful.
point of view
Posted August 14th, 2010 by stefanoWhen I was a student, "control freak" meant someone who's work was excellent and beautifully detailed.
detail shots of the Sagrada Família
Gaudi was a control freak.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 2 members found this useful.
Abrasiveness is Always Present in Certainty
Posted August 14th, 2010 by Jennifer GroveOf this, I am certain.
And that is the meta-awareness that is missing from ALL OF THIS. ALL OF IT!!!
And I am sick to death of this lack.
The feelings that arise in me when I listen to people talking shit about others is making me physically ill. It is completely unnecessary and does NOT need to be included in order to open to new perspectives. There is so much of this going on in here right now that I'm having a hard time participating at IL currently.
--
For just $14.95 a month, YOU TOO can reduce your Karma Footprint by becoming a Member of Integral Life!
[has that already been done?]
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
transcend & include
Posted August 15th, 2010 by stefanoJust from first glances [1], he seems to be advocating a particular vision, namely, early man's tribal openness and love of nature and woman, and that to understand that early stage, he says we need a poetic approach. By contrast, Wilber he describes as dry and thin and just a bunch of diagrams.
Never mind philosophy, just the architect in me is wondering how this guy can on the one hand affirm poetry, but at the same time fail to see beauty -- yes beauty, elegance, rigour -- in Wilber's AQAL.
Nature has incredibly intricate systems that work; unsurprisingly this "intricate & works" makes it exquisitely beautiful.
To the extent that AQAL works, it is beautiful.
[1] Just looking at some of the content, and deliberately ignoring the descriptive speech, like how he's characterising one thing as just a "textbook" and another "a work of art". I'm wondering about his overall vision. I'm having a look online at various snippets. My wife says we should buy some of his books and check, like we did on the feminism thread, when we went and read "Feminism is for Everybody".








.jpg)

Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 2 members found this useful.
[Comment Deleted]
Posted August 14th, 2010 by admin