The unique self and the pearl beyond price

 Kelly, When I heard Ken's initial description of Unique Self in the audio presentation, at the point that he described 4 enlightened souls still seeing the ash tray from the different points of view of sentient beings, I immediately thought of "purpose" or "Calling" - the idea that those perspectives might add something to some collective evolution, or toward the "re-membering" of the slumbering Mind manifested into material objects, etc. (German Idealism's notion). This seemed to be an additional aspect of enlighenment that one might call "purposeful enlightenment". The sense of purpose, or  thoughts of "necessity" (David Bohm), tends to fall asleep (or, in Bohm's view, fail to go deeper into new orders of necessity) in action, unless enlightened by the pure subject, open, formless, state. It reminds me of the supposedly reciprocal relationship between matter and anti-matter.

There seems to be a "need" (or benefit) for both " enlightened purpose" and for "purposeful enlightenment". Are these two both at the intersection of "agency" and "communion", and only differ according to whether you come to the intersection from agency (purpose) or from communion (enlightenment)?Different doors to the same place?

Just some thoughts to put out there,  Darrell