Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 2 members found this useful.
The Effect of a Diagnosis on Patient Quality of Life
Modern medicine relies on a compartmentalized approach to diagnosing and treating patients. Although this approach varies from the more "whole patient" approach commonly observed in eastern medical theories where establishing and maintaining health is the priority, it can be exceedingly powerful and effective in treating specific medical problems. In order to provide treatment, a discreet diagnosis must be determined because modern western medicine uses a diagnosis as the begining step in the logical determination of treatment modalities. It is necessary to point out that this is not the only way to design a medical system, but rather this system exists as the maturation of the ancient art of medicine. It is within reason to consider an integral approach to medicine that incorporates the eastern and western traditions into a completely new medical approach, perhaps even a program that simply flows into everyday life in a form that embraces health and accepts illness with a minimum of angst- BUT, we are a long, long way from anything like this and shifting a cultural institution like medicine, especially where there is such a high financial stake for so many is an extremely difficult and slow process.
Because such a complex issue must be broken down initially in order to understand the subject, I would like to begin this blog with an examination of the effect of a diagnosis on a patient. Let's initially examine the effect of a diagnosis of mild to moderate arthritis in a 45 year old female. Most adults of middle age and above, in their day to day life have routine aches and pains and most Americans will routinely treat themselves with aspirin, acetaminophin, ibuprofin, etc. A patient who has a knee that aches naturally assumes that it will eventually get better. Sure it is inconvenient and uncomfortable, but it's just part of life. When the patient sees a doctor who renders the diagnosis of arthritis the entire picture changes however. There are a whole host of cultural assumptions around arthritis that seriously and negatively impact the patient. Arthritis is associated with old age, is considered a progressive disease and leads to disability and inactivity, possibly knee replacement, etc. The disease is no more severe the day after the diagnosis and may never become truly disabling yet the patient is likely to show negative psychological effects of receiving the diagnosis with depression and a limitation of physical activity a distinct possibility. The patient's condition is no worse and her treatment is basically the same treatment she was providing herself using over-the-counter medications prior to the diagnosis but the patient is now far worse than she was before.
As an example, during my undergraduate career I worked in the neurobiology lab of Nobel Laureate Roger Sperry. Roger Sperry conducted much of the foundational research on "left-brain, right-brain". We conducted brain surgery on rhesus macaque monkeys. I would like to ensure those who are concerned that the research was compassionate and, beyond the single surgical procedures the monkeys underwent which produced no obvious impairment, that the monkeys lived long and comfortable lives. Monkeys and other animals behave very differently from how humans behave following a surgical procedure. Humans, following brain surgery are bedridden for days while animals, post-surgically, are up on their feet,active and a bit pissed off within minutes of coming out of the effects of the anesthetic. Our higher level of understanding and concern about disability impedes our ability to recover.
Keeping in mind that we must look both at developing an ideal medical system for implementation in the future which is potentially completely different from, yet that incorporates, the best of western medical theory, as well as trying to find an approach that can be implemented in the short term that minimizes the negative outcome of the diagnosis. So how can we approach this problem and specifically identify a problem with a person's health and treat it without harming a person's quality of life through providing them with the diagnosis. This is further complicated by the culturally ingrained desire of most patients to be given a specific diagnosis for every minor discomfort.
So... how do we diagnose and treat a patient while maintaining the patient's self image of being whole and relatively healthy? I don't pretend to have any answers, but am hoping that an integral discussion of the topic will shed some light on the topic.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 2 members found this useful.
Diagnosis Effect
Posted December 26th, 2008 by Mike BrelandI agree completely with your analysis of the effect of a diagnosis on a patient's quality of life, as well as your close-to-the-end statement about the cultural need for a diagnosis, since I deal with this issue daily.
I suspect that people are effected by their diagnosis to a certain degree and in a certain pattern based upon their level of cognitive and self-development. Some of my patients grab on to their "bone spurs" as the complete reason for their pain and may use that as a reason to apply for disability and end up becoming "disabled." However, I think many of these types of people also have co-morbid psychological issues, which indeed may make them at least temporarily disabled in our present culture/society. I'm not using it as a pejorative label but as a general descriptor for patients that physicians see all the time that fit this particular pattern.
Then I have the patients that when they are told they have "bone spurs", their first question is: "So, what can I do to fix it or make it better?" And many of them are very motivated and most of those patients do end up getting much better.
So, when I see a patient, I take a social/psychology/sleep/work history so that I can see how much residual energy they have left over at they end of their day, since that is what they will have to use to get better. Some have virtually none, since they live in near chaos, internally and externally. They don't usually do well, unless something changes. For the ones that have "enough" residual energy, they usually get a lot better, IF they are willing to do the work. Unfortunately, a lot of them just want a pill or to be "fixed" with the magic bullet, another of our cultural issues and beliefs.
So, the punch line regarding what can we do, is that it depends upon the level of development of the patient. For the dependent patients, I explain that I believe they do have pain, but they can get a lot better if they will follow the regimen I recommend. I also send as many as I can to counselors, etc, but $ is always a limiting factor there, as well as the need for more integral counselors and methods that actually work. For my other patients, it usually varies between just setting up and program and they do it, versus being a psychologist/cheerleader and cajoling them into doing my whole program rather than just wanting to take a pill that makes them not care they have pain.
For this to work, the "integral" or holistic or complementary or whatever approach needs to be taken. However, our system of medicine is so broken and our culture/educational system (Jeanne, I thought you might like that) so generally neglectful/unbelieving of the interior self that presently little to nothing is being done to develop really good tools to move people along, especially when they are actually open to such things, such as while they are in school. However, presently this is a "sacred cow", because, bless 'em all, many/most parents say it is their job and then, imho, either don't do it or do a poor job of it. And honestly, I don't blame them. They get out of high school, have not real job skills, their culture tells them its time to have babies, they do and lose one of their members for a while or longer, the remaining wage earner has to struggle harder and work two jobs and so isn't there or is too tired to do all those things kids need to be healthy and whole. Ok, enough whining already, Merry Holidays and cheer to the world.
So, while my words may be a bit, well, much, I do have hope and I see integral methodology as being one of those hopeful ways. But I will address that in my comments on another of Jeanne's questions about integral developmental.








.jpg)
.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
the placebo effect
Posted December 26th, 2008 by steven martiniI am fascinated by the possibilities of what will be discovered when the placebo effect is explored though the quadrants:
What is it that allows up to 30% of the population the capacity to raise their quality of health by the simple act of believing - opening up space for bodies to be free of so called "impurities"?
What level of development are those within the lucky and blessed 30%? Does the level effect the ability and radiance of the belief?
Or is this percentage just the stock reflection of wave probability maya uses to pattern more illusion to the observer?
I know nothing of these matters. But I love the way they sneak through the mystery.
--
∞ 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 ∞