Please Log in to Vote.
12 out of 13 members found this useful.
Integral Cinema Studio: The Holonic Lens
The first Integral lens I will explore is the HOLONIC lens. This lens helps us look upon everything we perceive as a HOLON; a whole that is part of another whole. Holons are the essential building blocks of our reality. A whole atom is part of a whole molecule, which is part of a whole cell, which is part of a whole organism.
In the cinematic arts, a whole frame is part of a whole shot, which is part of a whole scene, which is part of a whole scene sequence.
In the cinema, compelling stories, well-developed characters, and potent visual and auditory journeys need to evolve holonically. Like an unbroken chain, every word, action, event, image, and sound must rise out of what has come before it, simultaneously birthing something new while holding traces of all that has preceded it. In addition, this holonic chain must extend beyond the confines of the cinematic work; characters, story events, and audiovisual thematic patterns must have roots in the unseen world before the first onscreen image appears and must have a sense of potential resonance extending beyond the final frame. While most audience members are not consciously aware of this holonic process, the viewer naturally senses when there is something missing in this developmental structure: We consciously or unconsciously notice when a character does or says something that seems “out-of-character;” or when a story event seems to come out of nowhere; or an image or a sound seems out of place. These holonic breaks always “take us out of” the cinematic experience and reduce the level of immersion by some degree.
By using the holonic lens, cinematic artists can shape richer, deeper, and more immersive cinematic visions, by more accurately and completely creating holonic evolutionary cinematic structures within the text, image, and sound streams of a cinematic work. When used in a masterful way, holonic cinematic structuring can produce great cinematic experiences, from Hitchcock’s classic shock-and-horror-inducing shower scene in Psycho (1960) to the profound ah-ha moment in The Sixth Sense (1999) when the final piece of the story puzzle gives the film an entire new meaning. In the case of Psycho, Hitchcock used numerous shot fragments, wholes unto themselves, each one strung together to transcend and include the previous ones, to build a whole experience that transcends the pieces themselves.
In The Sixth Sense the entire film is essentially two complete holonic streams, one on the surface that takes us through the entire film holding a certain perspective; then in the final scenes, a missing or hidden whole/piece (holon) of information is given us, and suddenly we see a whole new dimension of the story we had not seen before, and a whole other holonic story stream flashes before our minds in an instant. When viewed a second time, we can see that this other dimension or holonic story stream was always there. Here the filmmaker, M. Night Shyamalan, uses the missing or hidden holon in a positive and masterful way to create a profound surprise moment at the end of the film.
As The Sixth Sense demonstrates, the revelation of missing cinematic holons is an essential device in the creation of multi-dimensional cinematic storytelling, which appears to be on the rise with integrally-informed cinematic works like The Matrix Trilogy (1999-2003) and integrally-informed television series like Lost (2004-2010). In these and other Integral cinematic works we find stories that have multiple complex layers that are revealed one by one, increasing both the depth and span of the cinematic work as it unfolds. In The Matrix Trilogy, these layered revelations range from Neo taking of the red pill and discovering his world is a computer program to his discovery that he has taken the same quest many times before.
In the TV series Lost, layer upon layer of realities are peeled away through its six seasons, culminating with the final revelation that we have been on a journey through the bardos between life and death itself. This type of multi-dimensional cinematic structuring, created by multiple layered chains or streams of information, character, and story building holons progressively revealed by the emergence of purposely hidden holons, can produce both a highly immersive and repeatable viewing experience. In addition to information, character, and story building holons, and missing or hidden holons, those employed for a useful purpose or those that create holes or gaps in the cinematic experience, there are also question and answer building holons which are essential to cinematic narrative and audiovisual expression. The question can be as simple as will the character survive a certain challenge and the answer as simple as a yes or no. Usually the question must be answered by the end of the scene, sequence or complete cinematic work for closure; but the question can also be left open if the non-answer sparks a deeper existential question to be left for the viewer to answer. Cinematic holons also have positive, neutral, or negative charges, much like atomic particles. At the level of text an example of positive and negative charges can be illustrated by the energetic difference between moments of affinity and conflict between characters. Neutral holons are elements that impart neutral information, like an establishing shot of a location. Of course these can be turned into positive or negative streams by juxtaposing them with positive or negative elements (i.e., a neutral shot of a city at night juxtaposed with foreboding music…this is a combination of a neutral visual holon and a negative auditory holon). The rule here is that when a neutral holon is juxtaposed with a negative or positive holon the neutral holon takes on the attributes of the opposing holon. Like all lenses of perception, the holonic lens has the capacity to offer us a deeper and/or fuller perspective. When directed at cinema, this integral lens could potentially deepen and clarify our understanding and appreciation of cinematic structure and narrative form, and increase the creative and expressive capacities of the cinematic artist.
|
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
WAY!!!
Posted June 14th, 2011 by Jennifer GroveCOOL!!!
--
"The Left Hand Path, not merely the Right ... must take the lead."
~SES pg. 148
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Brilliant!
Posted June 15th, 2011 by RAJENDRA BENDREThanks for the treat Mark. It opens up so many avenues. Keep us engaged Mark! one day we will return the favor.
Regards
Raj
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
thanks
Posted June 16th, 2011 by maciekkMuch appreciated
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Integral Cinema Studio
Posted June 17th, 2011 by John Parker--
rigpa44
Great stuff Mark! Thanks!
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 1 members found this useful.
Absolute!
Posted June 20th, 2011 by vernpeacehi Mark, non-sense...what...happened...to...a
...simple...beginning...middle...and...end...lost
...was...a...complete...disaster...in...term...of...
a...form...of...the...art...of...film...making...matrix
...was...just...playing...with...one...simple...theme
...FEAR...you...post...has...to...be...right...up...there
...with...the...best...of...the...cods...wallop...vern...reads
...around...integral...circles!
peace&love...vern
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
On Simplicity and Complexity, and the Limitations of Lenses
Posted June 20th, 2011 by markallankaplanIt is important to note that the notion of holonic structuring in the cinematic arts that I am exploring here appears to exist in the full range of cinematic narrtive and audiovisual expressive patterns, from very simple stories and audiovisual expressions to complex multidimensional ones. Even the basic narrative/meaning-building string of a beginning, middle, and end is holonic…the beginning is transcended by and included in the middle, and the middle is transcended by and included in the end.
It is also important to note that while it appears that great cinematic works have solid holonic stream structures, without any missing holons that do not serve a holonic stream’s purpose, a cinematic work’s quality, effectiveness, and acceptance by the viewer is dependent on many more elements and variables…no single lens of perception can show us the whole picture of what makes good or great cinema. For example, while the TV series Lost had very solid holonic structuring, the ending was not satisfying for many viewers. This was due to several other factors, including problems with the worldview structuring of the final episodes…something we would discover if we were looking at this work through the WORLDVIEW LENS, which I will be exploring in an upcoming post.
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
An integral perspective on "Limitless"
Posted July 26th, 2011 by william brennanMark:
I posted this blog about the movie, "Limitless." I'd love to hear your take on the movie from an integral perspective.
I'd love to open an integrally-informed dialogue about the movie "Limitless." I personally really enjoyed the movie, but I also found it fascinating from an integral perspective. The director, intentionally or not, incorporated at least three perspectives in the film that gave it a more integral dimension.
Beginning first from the "It" perspective of "I-We-It", it showed the tradtional film director's perspective of the exterior dimenstion of the events of the film: people walking, talking, interacting, things moving and changing. However, the director moves on to incorporate a "We" dimesion of the film in that we are listening to a (essentionally interior) monologue from the protagonist as he describes his thoughts, feelings and interpretations of what's happing (It.) However this interior monologue actually comes across as if he is talking directly to us, the audience, as if in a conversation. This dimension of being spoken directly to by the hero gives a dialogue quality to the film between us the viewer and the hero ("We.")
The final perspective given by the director is the use of special effects to give us the subjective sense of how the hero is actually experiencing the world. Is his normal subject view, the hero experiences the world as...normal. Kinda boring, flat, darker colors, basically the egoic-mind's experience of life. When, however, he ingests the mind altering drug, suddenly the world (that the director creates for us, the audience to experience) becomes vivid, full, permeated by light (similar to some meditative experiences.) Even information and thoughts in this new view of the world become objectified; as the hero contemplates stock numbers we actually see the numbers cascading in from of us as the thoughts become objectified. In this third perspective the director attempts to recreate for us the actually subjective interior experience of the hero (the "I" dimension.).
This is the first film I've seen (or perhaps, noticed) that intentionally included (or made object) all three of these elements simulatneously. I'd love to hear other perspectives about the film from anyone else in the integral community, as well as any other integral film recommendations....








.jpg)










Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
My impression of your article
Posted July 15th, 2011 by Carey ButlerFor the most part it is an interesting correspondence relation of the practice of film making with integral theory.
I particularly like the statement:
[Cinematic holons also have positive, neutral, or negative charges, much like atomic particles. At the level of text an example of positive and negative charges can be illustrated by the energetic difference between moments of affinity and conflict between characters. Neutral holons are elements that impart neutral information, like an establishing shot of a location. Of course these can be turned into positive or negative streams by juxtaposing them with positive or negative elements (i.e., a neutral shot of a city at night juxtaposed with foreboding music…this is a combination of a neutral visual holon and a negative auditory holon). The rule here is that when a neutral holon is juxtaposed with a negative or positive holon the neutral holon takes on the attributes of the opposing holon.]
Exactly that use of juxtaposition of has been responsible for much of the suffering that mankind has put itself through!
It is (and has been used as) a means of manipulation for viewers who are unaware of what is being perpetrated upon them. The audience is confronted with contrived alternatives upon which to base their perspectives.
This method also has relational correspondence to errors in logic with respect to fallacies of context.
Thanks for helping me see this more directly than before!