Please Log in to Vote.
4 out of 4 members found this useful.
Even Ken can not know everything - The Shadow Elite
I have also been curious about Ken's perspective on US political establishment and structures. His views on Obama have always been measured with "lets see what he does..he looks right"..His assessment that Washington is cemented is also true but i am not sure of his belief that Obama wanted to change how things are run..
Not one of the interviewees even mentioned the corporatization of the US government. The incredible power of the military industrial complex and financial structures ( Federal Reserve). How media, financial institutions, defense, agriculture and thinktanks are now really managed by a powerful elite. Arianna Huffington January book of the month was a book by Jane Wedel called the Shadow Elite which looks at how few individuals influence/ control policy, investment, capital flow, policy and subvert the democratic process. President's come and go but the elite remain to transfer value to themselves.
The guy who backed Obama and was Chairman of his finance committee was James Crown whose family is three generation billionaires and owners of General Dynamics one of US largest defense contractors.
We live in a illusion of two party system that actually is different. It might have been in Lincoln's time but now this is essentially a game played out to reframe the popular opinion. In a system where public image is so finely managed and controlled with focus groups, pollsters - it is really tough to base anything on thing said..one has to go back to action speak louder than words
We have to understand the dimension of the integration of Federal Reserve, Defense contractors, Financial markets, Corporate Agriculture, Media monopoly, Thinktanks that define what we eat, see, wear and work. I dont think every in the history of mankind has corporatization been so rampant. Like any structure this can be misused to concentrate value and enslave in a few.
It is the goodness in all of us and the interviewees that we dont consider this..its tough for us to think like Stalin or Hitler. but a truly integral perspective would think of the potential evil and how to fight it.
pranam to Ken and all
love
Ram
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
yes, much truth
Posted February 7th, 2010 by Ambo SunoYes much truth, Ram. I like the emphasis you are giving this piece of the huge whole. The power of big business and influential people on everyday life is hard to exaggerate.
My guess is that much of what you have pointed to has been included along the way in Ken's understanding. How he, and we, synthesize all of this into the enormity is an ongoing surprise - when we speak and try to answer a question or address a particular what comes out of our mouths is partial. In a brief response if we try to be too inclusive and embracing, details are lost. If take a sortie into details, the sense of proportion will feel off to many whose inner snapshot is focused, perhaps, a bit to the side.
I personally am glad to be reminded by you of this emphasis; I appreciate your tone of presentation. Thanks. My fantasy is that Obama does understand much of this and he's doing his best to dance his way out of the puppetry and into his and the people's value systems more. In the self-serving influence and corruption of politics/military/business, it is not an easy feat to be elected and then rule with integrity. How I imagine it is that O is working his bootie off trying to keep larger visions and realities active and also trying to avoid the almost unavoidable pitfalls, like polarization. I have, in my mental interpretation of events, appreciated how he has danced thusfar - moderately pathetic though some results have been.
Looking at just one phrase of your post, "but now this is essentially [italics mine] a game played out to reframe the popular opinion." I want to say that it is not entirely clear to me what is "essentially". Forgive the hairsplitting, please. Sometimes it clearly seems predominantly reframing, co-creating popular opinion and thought. What I'm acknowledging is pretty close to what you are expressing. As an aside, this is what I think the republicans have been so successful at doing. Most everyone feels trapped in the construct of saying something like that "the American people are speaking out." It really has been largely a selling of a vision and I feel sad that, though there are valid points and emphases in the talking points, the message is often regressive. Painfully, detrimentally regressive. Reality is not a fixed construct in this sociopolitical arena but has potential flux. If Obama and we had been able to hold a different vision, the economies and practicalities may have followed in surprising ways; not always without stretch, strife, and struggle. Maybe that is still going on over a longer time frame.
As an other aside, I think he made some mistakes early on and revealed some of his limitations and sticking points due his history (as we all are held and moved by history). Ego, for example. Competitive, for example (showing regularly in his human and perhaps endearingly common joy of competitive basketball and sports). Wanting to be post partisan and more cooperative/collaborative than competitive, yet still has the competitive schema deeply and confusingly emblazoned into who he is. As a fall back, competitiveness can be useful, probably.
He wants things to be different, and along some lines he has transcended much, yet maybe this is some of his shadow. For cutting edge, it would help to not be fanning the bipartisan and easily polarizing counter-competitive flames with even minor and intermittent gloating, posturing, and "I won"s. For example, at maybe the earliest bipartisan meeting at the white house, he silenced the Republican power attempts with that phrase. "I won." Translated meaning that the people voted and elected me and I and my and my party's agenda represent the people. Which is a common reduction of the much larger and more complicated reality. I cringed when he said that as ego and as reminder of the Democrat we-space's pent up desire for getting back at. The Republicans were a bit humbled at that point, and maybe momentarily malleable with some uncertainty and maybe tentative accepting will, but I thought this small behavioral expression portended of the depth of difficulties in future working together.
Aiaiai. I think he is trying mightily. The task is bigger than he is. Of course. In retrospect, Daahh. The attractor grooves and ridges of the system too set, too beckoning of repetitive behavior. For the variety of US citizens, mythic Messiah, not quite.
That's what comes up from your post, Ram. Thanks.
ambo [Edit] PS Hey, Ram, would you mind going to those two other repeat postings and deleting them. (Having them is understandable. Until one understands how that error message and glitch works, we don't know what's going on.)