Please Log in to Vote.
7 out of 7 members found this useful.
Architecture and the Integral Life
Bravo! Alain de Botton and Stuart Davis's dialogue about architecture this week is excellent, and particularly relevant for me: my wife and I have an offer outstanding on a new home and I've been considering very deeply what it means to find and cultivate a "place" in which to live integrally. We are ambitious, having looked at probably 3,000+ homes online and physically walked through another 100-200, homes spread across 5 states and about 35 cities. The process has seemed a bit obsessive at times.
But I have held a strong conviction that a real home is a special and rare thing, a unique relationship created between the exterior of a house's architecture and the interior arising within us as we come to know its every fold, color, texture and angle. This relationship cannot be forced, and while unique, it must come into its own through a silent conversation that occurs between the heart and the eye as one wanders around every next corner, thrilled and surprised, provoked and assuaged, content and yearning, with nothing less than a love affair ensuing...
When we found the house that we finally(!) made an offer on, I noticed two things: first, that I was wrong in thinking that one becomes less attached to a sense of place the less one holds a sense of self identified with material "stuff." I had come to believe, largely through the excruciating process of looking and being consistently underwhelmed, that it wasn't the houses we looked at that were underwhelming but rather that it was in fact me that was underwhelmed - that is, I started to think that I probably am just less apt to identify with what any given house represents and therefore a home will just not be as exciting to me as it used to be. The Integral Life is characterized by seeing oneself reflected in everything, and I merely suspected the downside was that one does not, therefore, see oneself reflected strongly in anything.
Second, I now recognize the opposite is true. Because I was less attached in general to most of what I experienced, the counterpoint was that much the sweeter when we found it. You might say that an integral sensibility of patience and detachment caused me to be more picky, more specific, and therefore more delighted when we found something we really loved. And the key, in retrospect, is to view the process of exploration as a process of self-exploration, a fascinating and at-times quirky introspection. And now that we've actually found a place we love, this brings me to the deep inquiry of what it means to actually cultivate our space for integral living ...
Alain makes the observation that architecture has historically conveyed within it a moral statement, and only through the utilitarian tide of modernism and the relativistic tide of postmodernism have we lost both our personal awareness of notions of aesthetic goodness but also our willingness to insist that "place" can and should be beautiful. We are both numb and lulled into resignation and, I suspect, quietly ignoring our strong intuition that we desperately seek an exterior space that reflects the truth, goodness and beauty of our inner life. We want a home that can be a statement of our spiritual radiance while also representing a living process of our own integral unfolding. Why integral? Because I believe that each space in a home has some unique self, as it were, some special purpose to bring to the family it cares for. So the question to which I return is what is the art for every room in the integral house (art broadly as color, texture, furniture, design, and actual art)?
Should the kitchen be a place where our art and design celebrates breaking bread with family, the collective aspects of our lives, and where we are reminded of the solar plexus chakra (manipura, related to the stomach, strength, will and sustenance)? Is it masculine or feminine? Or should the kitchen evoke the procreativity of the sexual chakra (svadhistana, related to sex, emotions and feeling) and the reminder to be in touch with the natural biosphere which sustains us? How can we balance masculine and feminine expressions in the bedroom, emphasize the male/female duality which is at the heart of all creation? Should the bedroom provoke us to rend our hearts open in sexual yoga (as David Deida would put it)? How can the family room be a place of light-heartedness, communion, playfulness and interpersonal development? Where do we go for individual time, contemplation and study, cognitive and spiritual development? Where do we serve ajna, the third eye chakra of imagination - an art room, or just a place in the house with palette and paint, pen and paper, or a place to sit? And what role for the yard, a space that might remind of how immense the universe is as we walk into the outdoors and away from the safety of the inner-space? Can it prompt in us the humility and gratitude that we are even here at all, that in the unimaginable complexity and scale of 400 billion galaxies that we have emerged as self-aware expressions of Spirit-in-the-making?
A home is an expression of the art of living, an art form we all practice but one which we often don't recognize. Not just static art to be hired away to an interior designer to be completed and delivered, but a living process of our own unfolding, a process that demands nothing less than our deep awareness of ourselves as the artist, and indeed even us as the art. (But a great interior designer can be thought of as a spiritual coach in this broad sense, a far higher calling than merely exterior adornment. Let this be a call to any integral interior designers if you're out there, we want to talk to you!) All this and more has been on my mind lately, and I am deeply gratified that Integral Life has done something that fulfills why we founded the company in the first place - it has given me permission to simply be who I already am, freely and fully, by making explicit the rightness and naturalness of a deep intuition I've felt about the need for "place" to be beautiful. My deep gratitude to Alain and Stuart for this wonderful gift.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Cultivating Space - A MAP of INTEGRAL ARCHITECTURE
Posted June 20th, 2011 by Travis HerbI've been wondering why no Integral Architecture movement has become established quite yet. But I learned how only 3% of licensed architects while call their work creative! There's the rub!
I discovered Vipassana twenty years ago, Wilber's work fifteen years ago and I received a masters in architecture four years ago. Thus far, I am still dismayed at the opportunities for work of an integral caliber. Frankly, I feel indulgent having gone to architecture school when deep down, I knew there was little chance for doing the right-livelihood work I knew I must do. But hey, look how Integral Institute has grown these past few years! Clearly, there's a growing demand for integral architecture.
We've got a lot of work to do! Where is the integral analysis of the worlds architectural traditions? And what about the geomancy traditions and integral, sacred geometry?
The tradition of Organic Architecture Schools has been a good beginning of Integral Architecture. From this education and from my perspectives gained from Vipassana and wilderness travel, I developed a thesis on architecture that is simply this:
Architecture is nursery school design.
The thesis needs work, I know but I'm not sure how. Our minds and body's are our architecture. If our buildings co-opt our latent capacity to nomadically enjoy the wilderness with merely say a triple robe, tube of oil and a bowl, then architecture has done us wrong.
I'm designing with the object of letting-go in mind. Like a nursery school in the tradition of Froebel, Rousseau and Montessori, a good building should encourage you to graduate and leave! Steiner agrees I think, but he emphasizes more theatrical, athletic and in general, social stages before graduating from his architecture.
A home may seem different then a school but fundamentally (architecture means first-principles) they are both merely shelters over walls on floors. A school cannot help but build organically towards graduation and departure. A home is much more easily a trap. We've got to give it away to truly love and nurture our environment.
This is of course, easy to say but tricky to realize. I've noticed what seems a pre-trans fallacy on some of the blogs about architecture here. Perhaps Khalil Gibran himself has made this mistake. This leads to a sort of extreme pastoral, like Hobbiton from Lord of the Rings. Don't get me wrong, Peter Jackson hired a great crew to design and build Hobbiton. One of the best I've seen. It is the perfect permacultured suburb, no doubt. I love it but I know many would be stifled there. It needs a few venues to say the least.
" the deep inquiry of what it means to actually cultivate our space for integral living …" - Robb Smith
I agree that ornament and singularity are essential to an architecture that actually cultivates integral living. I also agree that the cost of architecture has made working with a professional cost prohibitive for the vast majority of us. But we are on the verge of a democratic renaissance in architecture. Modern composites and tooling are making available inexpensive structures that are tsunami proof and assemble in days. This frees up considerable resources for the craftsmanship required for good ornamentation.
So at present, I am working on a map of integral architecture, including the I, We and It perspectives for Fierce Hearts, Kind Hearts, Expansive Minds and Focused Minds.
Any help is much appreciated and I thank you all for this amazing community.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
The Art of Living
Posted January 8th, 2009 by Linda Hollier“A home is an expression of the art of living, an art form we all practice but one which we don’t recognize”
It is so wonderful to hear someone else sharing on a topic which I have been thinking about for quite a while now. (Hence my blog 3-2-1 HOMEwork).
“Place” should be beautiful.
I once read a book called “The Spirit of Place. Carthusian reflections”. In the introduction, the anonymous Carthusian, writes, “Culture is embodied in artefacts that express meaning and capture something of the beauty of creation as perceived by the human mind. Matter and spirit have mysterious affinities and can mirror one another”.
The sermons are accompanied by beautiful photographs of a Charterhouse – a community of hermits, in which monks had lived, worked and prayed since 1873. The author states that, “In some way, their spirit still inhabits the place. The sensitive eye discerns the fugitive traces they have left.”
Developing or becoming aware of this kind of vision - which is in a sense of the eye, the mind and the spirit - is most certainly a part of living an integral life.