Please Log in to Vote.
24 out of 25 members found this useful.
The Four Steps of Creative Ecstasy
Dear friends: On behalf of Ken and the entire Integral Life and Integral Institute staff I’d like to wish you the very best in this New Year. As ever, we are grateful to you for your love and support of the integral movement and the many ways you’re exemplifying wholeness for a world in transition. As you take on new things this year I’d like to offer you what I learned in 2011 about how to integrate one’s work in the world with the stillness of a spiritual practice, a question that was raised frequently a few weeks ago at ISE 3: Kosmic Creativity. The question always boiled down to this: How do I help to change the world while also not needing to change it? How do I integrate my creative passion while also cultivating my spiritual peace? These two ends of the spectrum—deep passionate engagement to something larger than ourselves and enough detachment to not become part of the problem—often seem to be at odds with each other. And yet they are profoundly important questions at a time when the world’s prevailing systems—from economic to education to healthcare—are disintegrating because their current stage of operating is neither complex enough nor conscious enough to meet the life conditions of the 21st century. At ISE 3 I briefly mentioned “four rules of creative ecstasy” and below I offer you a specific praxis of how I achieve this balance (haha, on my good days). The Four Steps of Creative Ecstasy
Step 1: Unflinching HonestyRest in emptiness in order to cultivate unflinching honesty.
Step 2: Radical ResponsibilityEmbrace form in order to take responsibility.
Really you have no choice than to be that which you are. You have a unique vision and when it derives from a place of stillness it will, in its essence, be love by any other name. You might call it your unique self. Take full responsibility for it. No one needs to validate your uniqueness or your vision. The more powerfully situated in love that it is—consider Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi here—the more people will feel called towards it. (But be careful not to mistake your individual responsibility with social regard from others, an instant ego trap that will make step 3 very hard.) In my experience, when done properly there should be the onset of a feeling of terror. Not a “Nightmare on Elm Street” kind of terror but an awesome, exciting terror that you have found your edge: you are staring into the abyss being called to do something you have no guarantee you can do or whether you’ll succeed. Unfortunately, with that excitement usually comes an over-attachment to a new story of yourself and a new self-identity. Now the hard part … you have to let it go. It’s time to move back to Nirguna Brahman. Step 3: Self-Emptying CourageRest again in emptiness to tap courage beyond self.
This third step is the hard part. It’s where many of us get stuck and where the ego loves to keep us stuck. As we know, it’s easy to be passionate about something if we’re curious. It’s even easier to be indifferent about everything if we’re cynical. The magic, the real tricky bit of a life in practice, is to be so wildly passionate about something that you’re indifferent about nothing and in turn not attached to anything. Give that some thought. Then let the thoughts go, because it’s time to get busy. Step 4: Affectionate DetachmentEmbrace form while resting in emptiness to act with affectionate detachment.
For some real practice, see if you can generate real, genuine passion about a complete failure of your vision. How might your failure lead to a more profound success for the next effort of its kind? How can you possibly know? We love to imagine that if we achieve what is in our mind’s eye all will be well. What fools we are! We simply do not have the wisdom or the prescience to know what a certain happy future looks like. We only ever know what causes suffering in the present, and it always is when we hijack the present with our imaginative future fantasies or our retrospective memories. By acting from a place founded in the first three steps, our actions, vision and determination remain fresh, centered and alive. And because we’re not fatigued by the slings and arrows of disappointed expectations, our energy remains abundant. Many people will think that this step is very hard, but I contend that if you stay deep in practice in step 3, you’re already partly home for step 4. Step 4 is about acting fully and forcefully from emptiness. It is not weak, soft or limp. It is focused, passionate and engaged. And yet it also allows what will come and lets go moment by moment. It allows a deeper intelligence in the fabric of reality to work how it will. It is humble yet strong and the power one can feel from someone in this space is JUST…PLAIN…AWESOME. (The video to watch here is Jill Bolte Taylor’s presentation at TED. Watch how she led an audience that was still largely afraid of tapping stillness and the way in which it moved them beyond themselves with her courage.) I’d like to think that in the 22nd century an embodiment of this cycle will be minimally required of a future “President of the United Nations.” Indeed it is pivotal to how power and leadership is crafting the world we know and so far the record is very mixed. Just imagine if the leaders of the 20 largest nations and the 20 largest companies in the world were able to articulate a compelling vision in service to love, have the courage to stand up for it against all odds, and most importantly encourage it to find its healthy expression through an example of non-grasping, non-attached leadership that inspired others to do the same. The result might be a natural upwelling of “right action,” selfless and loving service that acted with discernment and precision in the moment but then allowed the next moment to be encountered afresh. So let me close with a provocative idea: these leaders need their own leaders to look up to and follow. I’d invite you to consider the very real possibility that one of these people, the person who these CEOs, world leaders, and even community leaders can look up to—a person who is setting a groundbreaking example of leading from love, a person who is integrating passion and peace in a serious and focused way, a person who is moving the needle for a world in transition, that this person, this unique individual leading from creative ecsasty, is none other than you. And that 2012 is the year in which you tap the courage and engage the practice to do so. Here is wishing you a terribly exciting 2012. Go get on the edge and stay there. Warm new year regards, *Photograph taken by Mathias Weitbrecht at Integral Spiritual Experience 3
|
- Please Login to Add Comments
- show all sub-comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
2 out of 3 members found this useful.
1. 2. 3. 4. tell me that you'll practice more
Posted January 17th, 2012 by Jonathan EricssonThanks Robb.
I had been thinking lately about emptiness vs form being something that should be practiced cyclically, and maybe drawn on a 4-quadrant mandala. So the notes I took from this are now on a mandala, in my pocket. To the poster before me, read the part about cynicism. Wishing everyone a year of Evolution.
J.E.
Please Log in to Vote.
3 out of 5 members found this useful.
Thanks Robb
Posted January 17th, 2012 by StanleyThere was much well thought information in your post. Learning how to work hard and passionately without too much attachment to results is a good and difficult lesson to learn.
I would like to comment on this; "How do I integrate my creative passion while also cultivating my spiritual peace?" Cultivating spiritual peace has been a large part of my spiritual practice for some decades now. When it works it feels great. And I feel that now my growing edge is to not cling to peace quite so much and learn to see that Spirit is always already equally available in all of our states including the ones that don't feel very peaceful. This is something new for me. I'll let you know how I'm doing with it.
--
No cyber-stalking please. http://integrallife.com/member/stanley/blog/cyber-stalking
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
a clarification
Posted January 18th, 2012 by Layman PascalMy remarks were meant to suggest a possible addition in all of us, not to criticize or merely self-express. It is my assumption that only what I already deeply agree with deserves to be "poked" or "cautioned". Perhaps this was not quite the place for it but it was the situation in which I glimpsed something beautiful and fascinating in my own feeling -- and drew connections between other remarks I've heard and some of the tonal & aesthetic qualities which are core to the Integral effort and wonderfully expressed in Robb's post.
Hopefully this will clarify a tad:
Integral is a kind of virtue machine. We make a special historical attempt to synthesize, to mutually affirm all good things -- even those which have traditionally been seen as antagonists. We are the both/and people. Our idealism & our skepticism are good friends. Our bodies & souls, our Uncaused Alreadyness & our Perpetual Creative Energetic Enactment are both learning to sing each other's praises. Consciousness & Unconsciousness. Gross, Subtle, Causal. Etc. We're all in!
We feel into value core in each other, in every philosophy, every chakra, every one of our own sub-personalities. We hope, we trust, we sense that all these golden slivers can be aligned into a tremendous & tremendously effective worldpicture wherein human beings are passionately, compassionately, wisely and progressively super-linked -- with each other & with their own richest, deepest and most comprehensively unique path toward real human and spiritual engagement with our world.
Sometimes people who embody this also embody an anti-wave, a quasi-wave, an unknown ghost who turns all this (without disbelieving it, without ceasing to enact it) into ash in our mouths.
Periodically individuals feel suddenly disengaged from this entire approach. And for all sorts of reasons. They might connect these feelings to critiques they've learned to make in other realms and levels of being. Perhaps they attack as if confronted by "new age" superficiality. Maybe they recoil from presumed hypocrisy or stagnation. Often they fill with an anxiety or agitation which is their own inner energy in revolt against the limitations which have thus far inhibited it from taking full action along its own unique path (a path which threads alongside its own edge, a path-edge nicely articulated in Robb's post & his reply to my comments).
Maybe people are saying that our theory doesn't become ethical action intensely enough. Maybe they are claiming that the integral approach to shadow work betrays an overly ascending orientation. Perhaps others here have simply heard the same sincerities so many times that they naturally begin to hold them among the insincerities (and this is very different from saying they ARE insincere). My own feeling is that a lot of these criticisms are not quite, not yet, saying what they mean. I think they are expressions of something deeper and stranger.
It would, for example, be sensible to expect than any Integral cultural sub-field, so loaded with virtue and engagement, so teeming with affirmative-inclusive dialectics, might provoke a periodic response of anti-virtue, disengagement, inclusion-allergy, suspicion-of-affirmation. If we listen closely we will hear that people are expressing this from time to time -- and they always feel like it isn't quite being heard. Assuming we want to affirm & include even this -- How can we hear it better?
We would, firstly, have to make space for it. We have to say it, even if we also already feel and know beyond it. We have to try experimentally languaging it even if we could easily address it (and, no doubt, others will pop up to provide precisely the answers we could have given ourselves). In short we would have to hesitate a little... and not be so quick to deploy our fine skills & sincerity in the task of healing this breech, the task of re-aligning it with our affirmations, the task of rooting out its subjective and structural sources in the circumstance of the individuals.
We would have to want to hear it -- on its own terms.
We would have to want to even encourage the opposite of our clearest, most sincere, most comprehensive Integral insights.
Can we even imagine what Integral might become if it grows so much that it rolls over into something that our currently best intuitions would scarcely recognize? Who knows if this could even happen... but there may be much that our current wisdom, our current mood, our current aesthetic, our current approaches, have yet to discover. And where can we look for more? We must look, as Hegel might, in the subtlest whispers of what might opposes us without denying us.
This is what I am expressing. A kind of "mood" that may yet lack a name. A "something" which subtly shifts but does not oppose, deny or recoil from our usual Integral attitude.
And, as Robb might well observe, this is a kind of edge, a kind of unique concern, a kind of passionate curiosity...
Thanks, I've been...
Layman Pascal
(to receive other "Weekly Harangues" write to: pretendtomeditate@gmail.com)
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Love it, live it.
Posted January 19th, 2012 by Maria Baes--Hi Rob, your words strike a deep chord with me because you walk the walk. I see how often I am limited by my fears and how I need to practice affectionate detachment. Not easy to do when you are in your sixties and have a propensity toward worry. I was thinking about how many of those presenting at ISE 3 do everything that you speak of in the four steps. That's why they are there, because they have been unflinching honest and radically responsible for their vision. They have faced their fears and will continue to face their fears as they bring their vision into the world. And they need to be detached of the outcome of they are to keep their sanity. I must have walked at least some of this talk otherwise I would not understand the immense difficulties that many of you have already overcome and are still willing to overcome in order to bring your unique gifts to the world. You are my inspiration.
Maria Baes
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
1 out of 1 members found this useful.
Thanks!
Posted January 19th, 2012 by RobKingThanks Robb, This is the kind of insight that I can really use in living my life and really putting myself out there in the world while not being attached to the results. It brings the power of spiritual practice into the world rather than creating an artificial wall of separation between our spirituality and our acting in the world. I have been struggling to articulate how my spiritual practice can empower this overwhelming impulse to give my creative gift into the world and I think you have nailed it! This is very practical insight that I am very hungry for and I think we need desperately. I think it is possible to get so caught up in concepts (which are indeed important) that we forget to access our spirituality in a way that can help facilitate deep change. Wow! Deep gratitude, Rob King
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 1 members found this useful.
Further Reflection
Posted January 22nd, 2012 by StanleyI think this is a really strong post worthy of further study and reflection. On my second go round I picked up these highlights.
let the thoughts go, because it’s time to get busy. - At the beginning of the day if we won't express our thoughts and theory out in our lives and in the world they won't add up to very much.
Expend energy, not effort. - If we can do this we can maintain a sustainable effort over time.
We simply do not have the wisdom or the prescience to know what a certain happy future looks like - It is helpful to have the humility to be able to admit this.
not fatigued by the slings and arrows of disappointed expectations - The above practice will help us to do this.
compelling vision in service to love
selfless and loving service - Robb spoke in terms of world and business leaders. I think we are ready to begin doing this as an integral community. This has been an ongoing theme of this author for some time now.
--
No cyber-stalking please. http://integrallife.com/member/stanley/blog/cyber-stalking - I have had to close with this statement because of so much cyber-stalking we have been having around here.
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse
Please Log in to Vote.
0 out of 0 members found this useful.
Thank You Robb
Posted January 23rd, 2012 by tanya charlieFor a great post. I agree with much of what you have to say. In particular with regards to learning to differentiate ones actual self, from one's self image. Sitting watching the breath while becoming aware of what is, as opposed to what should be, is the ultimate excersise in existential awakening.
Blessings
Tanya
- Please Login to Add Comments
- Report Abuse








.jpg)


Please Log in to Vote.
4 out of 5 members found this useful.
The Four Step Program
Posted January 17th, 2012 by Layman PascalHi Robb & co.
Thanks, etc.
The winter sun is just replacing a snow blizzard. My socks are wet from outdoors. What am I curious about right now? There is a strange feeling rolling over me -- as if I were up on the roof watching an alien invasion fleet pass slowly overhead.
What is this feeling like?
It is like being totally turned off by Second Tier hyperbole. "Unflinching" and "radical' sound like dead hype. Just for me, perhaps, just for right now. Certainly I could readily roll myself into a sympathetic affirmation of these notes. I could open my heart to them... but that's almost the easy way out. It doesn't teach me anything about this present feeling.
Undeniably, I stand for a truth which does not flinch -- so why does "unflinching honesty" feel like so ideologically unnecessary? Truly, I want to respond from the deepest transformative root of being -- so why does "radical responsibility" feel as useless as newspaper headlines & advertising slogans?
Of course Integral has an answer for these things. I can answer them all myself. But what is before the answering? Is it only me? Are "we" feeling it as me?
Why does this "depth" I keep hearing about sound so strangely superficial? Why does the simultaneous affirmation of the already-perfect emptiness & the necessity of creatively sharing our own unique gifts in response to the tangible issues of the day... sound trite? Like a hobby. Like "getting real" and "really doing it" and "being the change" are so common that they fall right off. Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic? No -- but still...
Why am I sick of hearing about Martin Luther King Jr. & Gandhi? They could be spiritual pipsqueaks for all I know. Did they really have good effects? By what standard? All I know is that they are TV excitement figures, the watercooler saints of the sophisticated. The sources of slogans for posters and cards in the incense-filled gift shops of the soul.
Why do clever phrases which make positive life-action & creative attachment sound like the new expansion pack for the online game of "spirituality"? And why are my eyes rolling?
Of course I am exaggerating a little. My eyes aren't even moving. This post is either a voice from out of my own "void" or the sound of something stirring in the collective integral soul. I think I have heard things like it from others. I think the seeds of an anti-enthusiasm backlash could be growing. Maybe not. Either way a backlash of any kind is good food when produced by the cooks we have around here.
Perhaps I'm making space in myself for my "own unique vision". Sure. But this very ability to match up the disquiet feeling with the affirmation to which it is responding... this IS what is troubling me. And what do I mean by 'troubling'? When I cease writing this message I will be fine. I am not troubled by it. But still... it could be troubling.
Is anything discovered by meandering back and forth across such vague boundaries? Heidegger thought so. But who cares what Heidegger thought.
Admittedly, Robb, I loved this line:
Expend energy, not effort.
Thanks, I've been...
Layman Pascal
(to receive other "Weekly Harangues" write to: pretendtomeditate@gmail.com)