Please Log in to Vote.

13 out of 13 members found this useful.

This Week's Newsweek: Bill Clinton Points to Stages of Consciousness

From the Article:

NW: What you're describing is the end of "future preference" [the idea that each person has an obligation to sacrifice today for the benefit of tomorrow, a longtime Clinton principle].

Clinton: Yeah, I'm worried about it. The rich countries' problem is rigidity and the poor countries' problem is capacity. Then we all share a problem that was best articulated by the philosopher Ken Wilber. He's got this theory that there are basically 10 levels of consciousness—the way we view ourselves, the way we view others—and that it's almost impossible for people to keep up with what circumstances require. If you live in an interdependent world, you have to believe as a starting premise—it doesn't mean you'll never go to war, doesn't mean you'll never fight, you can't be naive or stupid, doesn't mean we shouldn't be out there trying to get the leaders of Al Qaeda—but you have to believe that in an interdependent world, what we have in common is more important than our interesting differences. And the only way to celebrate and make the most of our differences is to get rich out of our differences, create vibrant markets out of our differences. It enables people to have fevered debate in politics without stealing elections or shooting the opposition. For me, if you ask how do you live with inequality, instability, and unsustainability, my answer is you've got to build the capacity of the poor people of the world and build the flexibility of the rich countries and move away from rigidity.

Then in both places the rise of nongovernmental organizations gives us real hope. You know, half of America's foundations have been created since I became president. It's an exploding thing. The promise of being able to create partnerships with governments and the private sector and proving we can do things much faster, cheaper, and better is really important. I just think that you have to make the financials work. If you don't make the financials work, you're just whistling Dixie, and we're all just giving speeches.

Please Log in to Vote.

2 out of 2 members found this useful.

Nice to see, but misleading re: Integral Theory?

I had previously heard Wilber mentioning his "media endorsements" by Hillary and Bill Clinton - and Al Gore too, if my memory serves me - and it's nice to see a follow-up comment by Clinton, even a brief and pared-down one.

Probably for the sake of expediency and relevance, Clinton seems to skip over a lot of the subtlety - nay, the main ontology - of Wilber's philosophy. The point that it sounds like Clinton is making is "We need to acknowledge each other's differences in a constructive rainbowish way, and here is an example of a philosopher [Ken] who does so". In this context, he's framing Wilber's philosophy as a matter of respecting others' worldviews even if you can't understand or "keep up" with them, and understand that some worldviews are more adequate for given situations than others. This doesn't even address the concept of evolution in these levels, particularly the idea that evolution of consciousness might lead to a greater tolerance of difference, fostering the sort of unity-in-communion that Clinton stresses as so necessary.

But pragmatically, this complaint is just a matter of scale. If Clinton inspires 10 people to start reading Wilber's works, and 1 of them clicks with Integral Theory and applies some of our principles to heal fragmentation, it's worth it. After all, as I recently read in a 2004 article by Brad Reynolds, the European Renaissance was by some accounts spurred by a core participant group of just 1000 people or so. Every comment like this, matters.

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

"...build the capacity of the poor people of the world and build the...

Thanks Robb! WJC is one intriguing fellow!

"...build the capacity of the poor people of the world and build the flexibility of the rich..." - Nice line.

Another nice line from earlier in the article, which suggests not only an integral context, but a direction...

"I really believe creating a shared intellectual framework—not just for policymakers and business leaders and labor leaders and education leaders, but for real people who intuitively know this is true—is a precondition for not only the United States, but others making good decisions going forward." - WJC

AHHHhhh, the Lower Left. The more red gets access to post-industrial Lower Right technology (communication as well as weapons), the more important shared understanding becomes. Imagine if Obama busted out that line, and backed it up with a hour-long explanation to the American people (and hence the world) about why it matters?

Is it that no one is listening now, so Bill can pull less punches? Is the office of President so political that only watered-down truth is palatable?

I am wondering...

--

Mark Michael Lewis - The Thrive Coach - Know Your Purpose. Build True Wealth. Love the Journey. - http://GameOfThriving.com - http://OptimalHumanValues.com