Please Log in to Vote.

6 out of 6 members found this useful.

Jun Po Kelly Roshi

In Reference to:
The Deep Mind of Zen

This is not an unbiased article. The more I listen to this man the bigger of a hero he becomes in my eyes. These are some notes from his conversation.

Insight -  Who am I? What was your original face before your mother was born? Have the realization that I am purity, emptiness,  causal.

Spontainous embodiment with the arising of insight. We walk the walk.

The unique self is not about being a manic big deal. The unique self comes after prolonged periods in the causal state. Compassion, humility, and unreasonable joy spontaniously arise with an authentic experience of the causal state. Then we translate this back into our life and express it in our life. Otherwise it could all just be an escape.

If there is no humility and compassion it is not the unique self. With causal inspired humility and compassion unique self is ordinary self. Turia is pure, naked, non-judging, and compassionate awareness. We can watch our life unfold from there. There is a perfection in this. Chogyan’s behavior might have been unacceptable but he got the joke and saw through it.

Dharma path

·        Compassionate relationships. Are we torturing the environment as we gather together to congragulate ouselves on our unique selves? Because we are in a sacred relationship we are allowed to be cruel? If I’m aware I care. If I care how do I express that? Who am I inside a body and culture?

·        Emotions - When we experience a negative emotion like anger, fear, or sadness this means that we care. We need to become aware of how we care and choose a good way to react, such as with receiving, openessness, and compassion.

·        Conscious embodyment. Is my dance integrated?

·        Deep insight and manisfestation of insight.

We live in interesting times filled with challenge and opportunity. Pain brings change. The arhat – up and out. The broken heart calls us to act with compassion.

If we are integral why is this not reflected in our behavior? If it is not reflected in our behavior, where are we realy at? If you don’t act like you care; where are you on the developmental map? The shadow of integral is that we study the map and voice the map but don’t look at where we really are in the territory.

He does not have such a great opinion of the integral folk he has met. He says that we are slippery. I do agree with him. First let me state that there is a huge amount of room for me to improve and it is the same for our community. As a community we have not yet done much in the way of charity work. Most people who consider themselves our famous leaders rarely share freely in our forum. Sorry but this even includes Ken.

I have seen little in the way of healthy humility expressed. I could go on. And there is great hope for improvement. Despite Jun stepping on many of our toes pretty hard, at the time of this posting 61 out of 64 people found his talk helpful. It does look like many of us do have open minds and that does count for something.

Has anyone here had the opportunity to study and practice with this man? What was that like for you?

Please Log in to Vote.

4 out of 4 members found this useful.

...

Most people who consider themselves our famous leaders rarely share freely in our forum. Sorry but this even includes Ken. I have seen little in the way of healthy humility expressed.

I liked your post but it was ruined by that statement. I see no good reason why Ken would be productive on these forums. Let me explain what I mean. I occasionally try to read one of the many books that Ken has referenced in his writing. I soon discover that I have made a huge mistake. "The Ever Present Origin," "The Inner Journey Home," "Being and Time," etc. I try to read the text but I can't make it past the first page. So let me get this straight. Ken has read these texts, and hundreds more like them, has digested their meaning and detail, has formed some high level abstract pattern analysis, and has compared and matched these patterns not only across texts, but across fields and disciplines as disparate as neuroscience, anthropology, psychoanalysis, and systems theory (fields which on a normal day would never talk to each other anyway, as their language and expertise is just so different.) Ken then systematises these patterns into elegant orienting generalisations, proposing solutions to some intractable problems which have kept philosophers and theologians busy for thousands of years, and he even begins publishing this stuff from an early age. Early in the morning he practices meditation and deep philosophical analysis, and during the day he washes dishes to support himself. And you complain he lacks humility?

The point isn't that he washed dishes. The point is that Ken wrote his books in a way simple and clear enough for uneducated people to read. SES too much? OK, here's "A Brief History". Likewise, "No Boundary," so that the ideas, if they have any value at all, may be accessible to people. But just because the end result is packaged in a user friendly form, doesn't mean that we as individuals can hold a useful conversation with Ken. He is so out of our league. Ken writes books faster than I can digest them. There is no way a mind of his calibre should be wasting time. If anything, we should be feeling grateful to Ken, and feeling sorry for him that he didn't get to go to more parties. George Bernard Shaw said, "I want to be thoroughly used up when I die." How many of us can truly claim that we worked so tirelessly and with such devotion that we will be thoroughly used up when we die?

Please Log in to Vote.

1 out of 1 members found this useful.

I Loved This Interview

What I heard this time around is the "Narcissism". Recovering from Narcissism means you submit to Authority. It does not mean you become the Authority. But then, there's no way he could have gotten to the place he's at now if he didn't submit to Authority, so he must have "done his time" somehow or another. He embodies the Narcissist very convincingly. LOL If I were casting for a film, I would give him the part. 

He uses it to forcefully shove the unsustainable practices that are inconsistent with a higher mode of living out of the shared space. That's something I resonate with. I do that too. I may try to dance nice for a few steps, but if I don't see any movement, I'll get snotty about it too. I suspect that is one of the uses of Red energy. To tell the Voices of the Ancestors (old Systems and those who love them) to pack up and leave. I suspect one of the tests of whether or not you're embedded there or are consciously embodying with skill and awareness is if you can distinguish whether this is the most effective method for this time/space or if another way might be better. Since he claims to not understand why such System change is not automatic and a given, I wonder if he's made this an object yet or not. 

I don't have the fear/excitement about "Unique Self" turning into a Summer-of-Self-Love complete with egoic std's and the whole lot. It's possible to discern the difference and discuss this with tact. Especially in a shared space...

[rabbit trail] 

Recently I've been marveling at the whole Dominant Monad vs. Dominant Mode of Discourse thing. Exteriors exercising influence over Interiors and Groups exercising influence over Individuals, plus the reverse from Self outwards. I listened to the talk with Rupert Sheldrake today too, and found myself sensing that something is missing. As we move up the Spiral, I see us moving away from Group confusion and Towards Individuation. This decreases the amount of reliance that an Individual has on others and increases the amount of self-reliance. But why? And why would Integral come after all that Individuation if not to combine in an as-yet-unforseen way? Towards a Post-Individuation Group Combination of sorts. If all individuals were simply moving farther and farther away from inter-reliance, why are we developing all these skills and technologies which provide the abilities? And if we were only going up, out and away from each other wouldn't we end up in a sort of Entropy? Am I confused about this? 

Why am I even asking this? 

Because the incredible depth of skills and abilities that we are all developing individually have direct application to the Unique Self. I understand that The Unique Self is not the Super Individual. In some ways, it is the transcendence of the Individual, not down into a confusion of co-dependence, but into an awakened inter-dependence. This is why humility is a marker of Unique Self. It seems to be the opening of each Individual Eye of one Dominant Monad of some sort, and I'm just not sure why KW isn't allowing for that possibility. 

Or is he? Now? Is that part of what he senses is changing? 

I think part of the reason I don't have any sense of alarm about Unique Self is because I sense that there is a Whole that is waiting to receive it. A Whole that will make all those fears seem silly and brittle. 

[/rabbit trail]

--

For just $14.95 a month, YOU TOO can offset your Karma Footprint by becoming a Member of Integral Life!

[has that already been done?]

Please Log in to Vote.

0 out of 0 members found this useful.

[Comment Deleted]

This comment has been deleted by the author.