Please Log in to Vote.

1 out of 1 members found this useful.

Learning is Trial and Error

 

" ... and you can learn just as much from the errors as you can from the successes."

 

-- Ken Wilber in dialogue with George Leonard in:

The Shot Heard 'Round the World: A Brief History of the Human Potential Movement


 

 

Having done a number of "weekend whoopee sessions" myself, I've often wondered:

How it is that I ended up feeling that these experiential weekends were not nearly as great as they claimed to be, and also, that they nonetheless had a lot of value? And let me just say, this is very confusing.

What do I mean by value? Well, here's a few items that personally mean a lot to me:

  • Between the age of 11 and 22 I'd become desperately reclusive and isolated. Experiencing a vibrant connection with hundreds of people suddenly opened me up.
  • Growing up I'd come to relate to my own mom as just "the alcoholic" with all the difficult feelings of that relationship, which made me very very morose (even more so than I tend to be these days). After these weekend experientials, I started to gain a little humour, and I realised I could relate to my mum differently -- I realised I could have a great conversation with her whilst she was utterly drunk, and I realised I could actually start to hear her story through the drunken rantings. One day we both ended the call in a better mood than we'd started, and that was just magic.
  • On an intensive version of an experiential weekend, we were doing some sort of "who am I?" exercise. My head mass disappeared and I had one of those experiences that Douglas Harding calls "On Having No Head". Probably the only radical altered state I've had (I never do drugs).

However, all those things tended to happen either at or shortly after (a few weeks) of the experiential. In one sense that isn't a bad thing -- any peek at new possibilities proves they are available, even if only once, but to actually take it further, well, it is a case of shelling out the $$$ and turning up again in a few months. Meanwhile I return to my usual sucky programming.

I have often wondered how to rate those experientials and pick apart the good aspects from the not so useful aspects. It often bugs me.

Integral to the rescue!

The distinction between states and stages helps tremendously here. I wonder what did people do before they knew about that particular orienting generalisation? It just seems such a gem. 

My experiences on those weekends make much more sense in terms of states. I could enter a state of catharsis, a state of joy, a state of headlessness, a state of minus dollars in the bank balance. All those states. They are all potentially there, because they are all (theoretically) variations on waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, and they are always available. 

It is kinda like flying by throwing yourself in the air. You will be airborne... for a while.

Constructing an aircraft, however, that can stably remain at altitude, for the duration (your life) is quite a different matter. Something needs building. [1]

The other generalisation which seems to offer a lot of orientation, is the zone methodologies. Which quadrants is the experience working with? This may be one of the bigger reasons why so much of it doesn't stick, and why actual construction is so hard to get right. There's a lot of organisation and coordination involved. On a building site this would be the Project Manager; the guy who's job is just to oversee and cajole everything and everyone into being where they need to be, and doing what they need to do, and all in the right order. 

Of course, you need to know that the quadrants and 8 zones even exist as mental orientations in the first place, so you have a reminder of where to look. The Project Manager's plans don't need to be omniscient, nor even representing every conceivable perspective -- how do the neutrinos feel today? -- how does cheese smell to an ant? -- but it does need to cover the bases that count for erecting the structure. 

Discovering all this -- states and stages -- 8 zone methodologies -- was made necessary by the suffering inherent in all that mistake making by people who tried and tried stuff and often failed [2], sometimes succeeded, and on the whole, carried forward that compassionate desire to help the world. 

I was trying to make that sound "lovely". But mistakes are often deeply painful, messy, destructive, and irreversible. Sorry, that's me going morose again -- it just doesn't help having a surname that means "death" -- but some of us will try and fail, and offer to the world our mistakes as gifts so that others may learn, and try better.

Evolution is bittersweet.

I am grateful for the orienting generalisations which AQAL provides -- I look forward to the juicy mistakes it will inadvertently flower, so that future generations may learn, and try better.

 

[1] Rome wasn't built in a day. And just imagine how much hard work that was.

[2] I'm not referring to anyone in particular here, even though I started this post with a link to the George Leonard talk. I'm thinking broadly about anybody who tries to grow, and stumbles, often just because many ingredients are missing.

Please Log in to Vote.

1 out of 1 members found this useful.

well said

Hey Stefano, well said. I like reading your understandings and curiosities beneath "Integral to the rescue". If I felt more inner leisure, I'd probably express my specific resonance with several of your ideas.

Your mentioning of the three more personal aspects of your life were touching to me and I can relate strongly to a lot of what you say and what has transpired.

Trial and error and all the rest of the strange phenomenological brew - at least maybe we learn.

Warm regards,

ambo