Please Log in to Vote.

14 out of 14 members found this useful.

Mobilizing to Save Civilization

Lester Brown and Jim Garrison discuss the real-world consequences of climate change, especially as it pertains to the global food supply. Lester also offers a summary of his new book, Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization

Topics include:

- Tipping points: A discussion of Dr. Rajendra Pachauri's statement that if we do not decisively address the issue of climate change by the year 2012, "ecological forces could synergize out of control and humanity could lose any capacity to influence events.

- Our melting future: Some of the dramatic impacts climate change is already having upon the Arctic region

- The politics of scarcity: The direct effects of climate change upon India and China's wheat and rice harvest, as well as the rest of the world's food supply—culminating in nations purchasing vast quantities of property in other nations, just so they can grow food and send it back home.

- System shock: Some of the reasons why the world's governments have yet to form a global response to climate change

- Good under pressure: Examples of how humanity has been able to quickly restructure itself and adapt to crises in the past

- Plan B 3.0: A discussion of Lester's new book, a survival strategy for our early 21st-century civilization (available for free download here.)

- Final Words: Lester’s recommendations to help governments respond to the climate change issue; including cutting carbon emissions, stabilizing population growth, eradicating poverty worldwide, and restoring natural resources (replenishing forests, fisheries, aquifers, soil, etc.)

Lester Brown

The Washington Post called Lester Brown "one of the world's most influential thinkers." The Telegraph of Calcutta refers to him as “the guru of the environmental movement.” In 1986, the Library of Congress requested his personal papers noting that his writings “have already strongly affected thinking about problems of world population and resources.”

 

Jim Garrison

Jim Garrison is the chairman and president of the State of the World Forum, which he cofounded with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1995. The State of the World Forum (SWF) is often thought of as a "shadow UN," in that it is the largest forum of world leaders outside of the United Nations. From Margaret Thatcher to Ted Turner, from the Queen of Jordan to Desmond Tutu, from Jimmy Carter to George Bush Sr., all have been part of the extraordinary dialogue that is the State of the World Forum.

 

Written by Corey W. deVos

In order to take a truly comprehensive approach to climate change, it is important to see how all the major systems of human interaction impact each other—energy policies, economic policies, technological infrastructures, food production, transportation systems, political realities, etc. Our world has become far too interwoven for these matters to be dealt with individually, and devising piecemeal solutions without a sophisticated understanding of how they will ripple through the rest of our human systems can only exacerbate our problems. This is precisely the sort of work that is being done by people like Lester Brown, moving toward a nuanced understanding of how these systems interface with each other.

 

It can not be emphasized enough how crucial it is to take this sort of holistic approach to human systems—and yet, even if the full complexity of these systems are taken into account, even if we were to clearly understand how every single variable of human interaction affects the total equation of sustainable living, it is still not enough. This is why Ken Wilber's Four Quadrant model is so essential to the climate change discussion. A more detailed summary is offered below, but in a nutshell, our techno-economic systems represent only one of four irreducible dimensions of human experience, all of which must be taken into consideration if we are to fulfill our potential as stewards of this little blue-green marble.

 

The totality of our various systems represents the "Lower-Right" quadrant, or the "exterior of the collective." The other dimensions are:

 

- the "Lower-Left" quadrant, or the "interior of the collective": cultural realities, language, beliefs, world-views, sacred cows and taboos, etc.

- the "Upper-Left" quadrant, or the "interior of the individual": psychological realities, consciousness, cognition, values, personal beliefs, etc. 

- the "Upper-Right" quadrant, or the "exterior of the individual": observable realities, behaviors, empirical knowledge, etc.

 

Again, the Four Quadrants are explained in greater detail below—but this is enough to generally orient ourselves to a truly comprehensive approach to climate change, contextualizing Jim and Lester's discussion as an exploration of just one of four crucial dimensions of our interconnected world. By using the Four Quadrants as a guide, we take the full complexity of our 21st century problems into account while developing a roadmap to the next phase of human civilization.

 

For an even more detailed explanation of the Four Quadrants, we recommend you listen to Sean Hargens and Ken Wilber's discussion about Sean's new book, Integral Ecology.

 

 

 

According to Integral Theory, there are at least 4 primary dimensions or perspectives through which we can experience the world: subjective, intersubjective, objective, and interobjective.

 

These 4 perspectives, represented graphically, are the upper-left, lower-left, upper-right, and lower-right quadrants.

 

In the subjective—or upper-left—quadrant, we find the world of our individual, interior experiences: our thoughts, emotions, memories, states of mind, perceptions, and immediate sensations—in other words, our “I” space.

 

In the intersubjective—or lower-left—quadrant, we find the world of our colletive, interior experiences: our shared values, meanings, language, relationships, and cultural background—in other words, our "we" space.

 

In the objective—or upper-right—quadrant, we find the world of individual, exterior things: our material body (including brain) and anything that you can see or touch (or observe scientifically) in time and space—in other words, our “it” space.

 

In the interobjective—or lower-right—quadrant, we find the world of collective, exterior things: systems, networks, technology, government, and the natural environment—in other words, our “its” space.

 

What’s the point of looking at the world through a 4-quadrant lens?

 

Simple answer: Anything less is narrow, partial and fragmented! Integral Theory maintains that all 4 quadrants are real—and all are important. So, for example, to the question of what is more real, the brain (with its neural pathways and structures) or the mind (with its thoughts and perceptions), Integral Theory answers: BOTH.

 

Moreover, we add that the mind and brain are situated in cultural and systemic contexts, which influence both inner experience and brain activity in irreducible ways.

 

What’s more important in human behavior? The psychology of the mind (upper left), or the cultural conditioning of the individual (lower left)? Integral Theory answers, again: BOTH. What is more critical in social development? The habits, customs, and norms of a culture (lower left), or the products it produces (like gun and steel – lower right). Integral Theory answers: BOTH.

 

All four quadrants are real, all are important, and all are essential for understanding your world.

 

While some might like to reduce reality to the mind (upper-left quadrant), and others to the brain (upper-right quadrant), and still others to the influence of cultural context (lower-left quadrant), and yet others to the effect of systems (“it’s the economy, stupid!” i.e., lower-right quadrant), Integral Theory holds that ALL 4 QUADRANTS are indispensable. The more we can consciously include the 4 quadrants in our perspective, the more whole, balanced, healthy, comprehensive, and effective our actions will be.

 

And it all boils down to just four dimensions. It's as easy as I, we, it, and its!

Contribute

Blog Posts

Mike Breland's picture
Jim Garrison's 5-2009 talk contradicts...
  Trying to be integral, I am reading State of Fear by Michael... (more)
barbi hammond's picture
Thank you Al, Lester, Jim, Corey for a fine...
I am happy to see Integral notables taking a definitive stance on global... (more)

Explore

Related Media

An Essential Introduction to the Integral Approach

What are the Quadrants?

Integral Ecology

Uniting Multiple Perspectives on the Natural World