“Direct causation is easy to understand and appears to be represented in the grammars of all languages around the world. Systemic causation is more complex and is not represented in the grammar of any language. It just has to be learned.”George Lakoff
The polarity between Direct Causation and Systemic Causation reveals a tension between simplicity and complexity in problem-solving. Direct causation offers straightforward, linear responses to issues, where a specific action leads to an immediate result. This approach is intuitive and appeals to people at earlier stages of development, such as those operating in concrete operational stages. As George Lakoff notes, direct causation is easy to understand and is represented in the grammar of all languages, making it highly accessible. On the other hand, systemic causation requires understanding complex, interconnected systems and abstract relationships, which become more appealing to individuals as they progress into formal operational and post-formal cognitive stages. Systemic causation recognizes that many problems stem from the system they are embedded in, requiring deeper analysis to address root causes.
Both approaches have merit: direct causation provides clarity and immediacy, while systemic causation ensures long-term, sustainable solutions. To solve large-scale problems such as climate change, immigration, or social inequality, we must integrate both perspectives, balancing quick actions with deeper systemic awareness.
Direct causation offers clear, linear problem-solving. It appeals to earlier stages of development because it focuses on concrete, visible cause-and-effect relationships. Lakoff provides examples such as, “Immigrants are flooding in from Mexico — build a wall to stop them” or “Jobs are moving to Asia — impose tariffs to keep them here”. While this kind of thinking offers immediate, tangible outcomes, it often ignores the complexities of the broader system. Overreliance on direct causation can lead to shortsightedness, where only the symptoms of a problem are treated, leaving the root causes untouched.
Systemic causation deals with the complexity of interrelated systems. It recognizes that problems often have multiple interacting causes, feedback loops, and probabilistic elements. Lakoff points out that systemic causation explains why global warming can produce snowstorms far from the source of the problem, and why large-scale solutions need to consider all these interwoven factors. Systemic thinking appeals to those at formal operational stages and beyond, as it requires abstract and integrative thinking. However, focusing too much on systemic complexity can lead to paralysis or getting lost in the details, where action is delayed due to overanalysis.
Related Media
Holons: The Building Blocks of the Universe
Corey deVos
Join Corey deVos for this fun, fascinating, and far-reaching exploration of one of the essential cornerstones of integral theory — holons, or the apparently endless series of “part/wholes” that fundamentally compose reality as we know it. Accompanied by music, imagery, and animation, this presentation will not only help you better understand what a holon actually is (and what it isn’t!) but also how this understanding can radically deepen your appreciation for the natural world, and for all of the other holonic intelligences that exist alongside us on this planet.
From Polarization to Integration
Ken Wilber and Corey deVos
Ken Wilber and Corey deVos explore some of the causal factors behind so many of the regressive tendencies in our culture and politics these days, from new social pressures coming from social media technologies like Facebook, to the historic evolutionary trends that have formed and informed our major schools of political thought in the first place.
Recommended Training
with Beena Sharma
Integrating Polarities is a revolutionary new training program by Beena Sharma, designed to teach you the higher-order thinking common to leading-edge individuals at the integral stage of development. This training is designed to model the higher-order thinking associated with integral stages of psychological maturity, offering you a step-by-step process to help you learn these thinking skills and apply them to your life, your relationships, and your work in the world.
Enroll Now
More Polarity Maps
About Corey deVos
Corey W. deVos is editor and producer of Integral Life. He has worked for Integral Institute/Integal Life since Spring of 2003, and has been a student of integral theory and practice since 1996. Corey is also a professional woodworker, and many of his artworks can be found in his VisionLogix art gallery.