Running time: 2 hours 2 minutes
Written by Corey W. deVos
From the earliest tribal villages, bonded by blood and survival, to mighty empires forged by stone, steel, and strength; to sprawling kingdoms held together by myth, nobility, and theocracy; to the rise of modern democracies guided by discovery and the self-evident truths of Reason; to the emergence of environmental values and sustainable endeavors in the postmodern age; to today's vision of a more integrated planetary civilization.... Every step of the way, humanity has met the many problems faced by civilization in the same way: by building bigger, better, more enduring civilizations—bigger economies, better technologies, and ever-increasing standards of civic participation.
And so humanity has marched triumphantly from the dawn of civilization into this newly globalized world we find ourselves in today, solving the problems of one level by advancing to an entirely new level of governance and social complexity.
And the march continues. Once again our problems have outpaced our systemic capacity to solve, demanding yet another shift to a more complex and more integrated society. Climate change, global poverty, workers' rights, corporate accountability, market instability, corporate plutocracy—these are just some of the problems have grown too large and complex for any individual nation to handle. As our problems continue to grow on a planetary scale, and as individual nations become increasingly ill-equipped to solve these problems, the need for us to create a truly global governance that supersedes the modern nation-state becomes increasingly clear.
"You're not going to have a sustainable global economy unless you have governance that's on the same scale as the economy it's supposed to bloody govern!" - John Bunzl
But considering the fact that the majority of our human family—about 70% or so—is still pre-democratic in terms of their overall development of human cognition, values, and worldview, it's hard enough to get most people in the world to even go along with the idea of a modern nation state, let alone a global democracy that would hold them accountable to universal standards of freedom, liberty, and ethical codes of conduct. As Ken says, "not only is there a large percentage at first-tier not wanting second-tier, there's a substantial percentage of non-democratic that don't want democratic! In both cases, it seems like we just can't get there from here!" (John's optimistic response: "Ah, but you can!") Not to mention the fact that if you give a pre-rational society a one-person, one-vote system of governance, they will elect pre-rational leaders, who often end up jettisoning the very same system that brought them into power in the first place.
Of course, our problems do not end at the lower end of the developmental spectrum. As John points out, we are currently locked into a vicious cycle of destructive international competition, which ironically makes it even more difficult for things like innovations in clean energy and much-needed global regulation of financial markets to come online. This destructive international competition, and the unregulated global economy it has produced, also has the unfortunate effect of severely curtailing the actual power of our political leaders to bring meaningful solutions to our large-scale problems, in many ways compromising one of the most intrinsic values of democracy—the ability for society to self-correct by electing new representatives who can solve our problems. Thus, "true" democracy runs the risk of devolving into a pseudo-democratic charade of leaders who find it tremendously difficult to have any impact whatsoever upon our biggest and most pressing global concerns, even when they want to.
Another problem for developed nations is the fact that, for any global governance structure to be effective, it needs to be truly supersede the powers of any and every nation in the developed world, with some version of a global police force so it can actually enforce its own edicts. Ignoring the immense cultural paranoia that this would provoke, it's hard to imagine any modern industrialized nation handing over some portion of it's own sovereignty to such a global democracy.
The stakes are high, and the obstacles are great—but as always, there is cause for hope. Evolution has brought us through greater and greater scales of social complexity and self-organization, and it shows no sign of stopping any time soon. John offers several suggested solutions for building a global democracy, commenting on some possible structure and mechanics of this world government, and how we might even be able to get there from here.
Comments
Thu, 09/13/2012 - 16:41
"The stakes are high..."
- What are the stakes? A failure to evolve or a failure to evolve within the timeline of our subjective preference?
Kosmos does not shortchange itself.
Everything that currently can be currently is.
Ordinary perfection, as always.
Kosmos has plenty of time and space to actualize itself.
Earth's but a zit on the Original Face.
Let us not inflame this local evolutionary matter further with the itch of impatience.
Everything is exactly on time!
Mon, 09/10/2012 - 15:03
Hi Anne,
If the shift from first-tier to second-tier is tied to shifting from a world of perceived deficiency to one of obvious abundance we are still faced with the problem of shifting from a nation centric view to a world centric one.
I tend to be pretty much practical minded about these things and wonder about the consciousness of someone who was trained in allegiance to a nation state; this training includes a visceral reaction to the hearing of a national anthem, and the raising of a symbol of that nationstate. (Think award ceremony at the Olympics, the anthem is played, the flag is raised, folks respond viscerally.)
It's not clear to me that having a world centric flag or a world centric anthem are sufficient to the task; rather I suspect we need to be generous with our consciousness and our world as a whole. Think of of photograph of our blue planet taken from outer space. There are no lines on it to describe a nation.
And while this might be helpful I think it's still not quite enough to trigger a truly world centric view. It happens that I take a special view of planets, and if I think of the planetary system in which we live in family terms, the other planets are brothers or sisters or cousins or somehow related to us in an intimate and wonderful way.
I suspect that there other ways to go about this question, ocean currents for example are very much of a world concern and clearly can be seen to have a marked effect on any nationstate. There is no way that the British Isles for example could be sustained in the same way the United Kingdom without the effects of the Gulfstream.
Debris and other detritus from the tsunami in Japan wash ashore in North America.
A warming or cooling in the Pacific Ocean, El Niño or La Niña, effects the rainfall and crop production in the Midwest.
But still when I see Mars or Jupiter in the sky, I'm reminded when this pair is taken together, that in the language of the stars, it spells successful enterprise; then if we add a third factor to this pair, like the moon's node at the midpoint between the two, we are well on our way towards a practical and effective world centric view supported by timed circumstance.
-Charles
Sun, 09/09/2012 - 19:41
It’s amazing that it takes over an hour of dialogue to explain the problem (as if the explanation is needed to understand the proposal) when there is no apparent proposal. That in itself is a first tier dialogue, one designed to reel in the first tier thinkers, as they scurry for something to grasp, until their satisfaction is satiated by unrest.
What’s the point at this particular place in time? Does it help to hear what we are battling against; does that teach us to be willing and able to sit in the mud without wallowing in despair? In a sense, it gives some credence to my apathy but in another sense it allows me to focus on the system as a whole and the only way in which I can effect change. In seeing a system as an entity fortified by its foundational principles, it cannot be attacked from the outside. While the solution is within a single system, every individual must take allegiance within those walls, making their presence felt.
Tue, 09/11/2012 - 04:14
Hi Annie,
These are only the first two parts of four, and we will be publishing the second half this weekend--shifting gears into a discussion of John's proposed solutions. Stay tuned.