Putting the “Art” in Artificial Intelligence

Ken Wilber Aesthetic, Art & Creativity, Cognitive, Creative, Futurism, The Ken Show, Uncategorized, Video 2 Comments

Become a supporting member to watch the full conversation

Humanity is entering the Transformation Age, a new era of human civilization, with Integral Consciousness rising at its leading edge. Our members don’t use Integral Life as just another media subscription they use weekly or discard. Instead, most stay with us for years, using Integral Life to learn Integral Philosophy and build an integral mind slowly, methodically and when they need it. We’re here to help you shape the future that’s emerging no matter where your life takes you.

Get Full Access For $1 (30 days)* Or explore all membership plans → * Trial price for the first 30 days, then $20/month. Cancel or switch plans in 2 minutes at any time.

What is art, at its most fundamental level?

This is one of those perennial questions that we have been asking and re-asking at every stage of the human journey, from the first cave drawings all the way to the emergence of sophisticated artificial intelligence algorithms like MidJourney that are once again blurring the lines between art, beauty, meaning, and perspective, forcing new ways of thinking about this timeless question.

Watch as Ken and Corey take a fun and fascinating look at the intersection between art, semiotics, and technology.

Written and produced by Corey deVos

There has been a lot of buzz lately — and a bit of consternation — about a series of new artificial intelligence art platforms that allow people to input a series of prompts, and the algorithm then reconstructs images based on those prompts, often leading to some interesting and occasionally stunning pieces of art.

For example, this image, which just won first place at the Colorado State Fair art competition, resulting in a fair bit of controversy among artists and art enthusiasts:

Example

I myself have had a lot of fun playing with these platforms, and have even been using one in particular (MidJourney, the same software that was used to create all of the images above and in the episode) to help design imagery for many of my recent Integral Life discussions.

It is an interesting experience, playing with these platforms — you input your prompts and parameters into a text field, hit “enter”, and wait for the AI to respond with an assortment of images. The experience actually feels somewhat dialogical, as though the art that is being generated is emerging from a conversation between man and machine. But of course, there is no ghost in that machine, no real interiority or consciousness behind the curtain, and therefore no genuine meaning is being directly transmitted through the art. Whatever meaning we might see there is being generated by the user and/or observer, not by the machine itself. The images being produced may be beautiful, but I am not sure they become “art” until that beauty is then enacted and inhabited by a perspective.

Which is how art has always worked, more or less — a sunset by itself is beautiful, but it’s not art — at least not until someone comes along, frames it with their perspective, and takes a picture.

Example

AI is simply another new artistic tool people use to help augment their creative process, and there are always any number of luddites waiting in the margins to immediately denounce those tools as inauthentic. As always, it comes down to how we use those tools — are we merely substituting our creativity with convenience, or do we allow those conveniences to bring us to new levels of creative expression that would not have been possible before?

At the same time, there really is something a bit different with this kind of algorithm-generated art. It’s not quite the same as a new kind of paintbrush or musical instrument, because in many ways the tool itself is generating the artwork — guided not by an individual artist’s hand or carefully cultivated talents, but rather by the user’s verbal prompts, combined with the software’s neural network that is compiling and amalgamating any number of images and artifacts that already exist on the internet. In a sense, these algorithms are bridging the individual consciousness of the user with the collective creativity of the user’s larger community, culture, and society, while using a number of LR aesthetic heuristics (composition, symmetry, color theory, etc.) to generate an image that human beings can then recognize as “beautiful”.

All of this raises some fundamental questions about the nature of art, consciousness, and technology, which can probably only be answered in a satisfying way by taking a more integral look:

  • What exactly is art?
  • What is “integral art”?
  • What is the relationship between beauty and art?
  • Does genuine art require some degree of “artist’s intent”?
  • Can art be created by non-sentient processes?
  • How does all this inform our enactment of AI-generated art?
  • Are the AI algorithms themselves something we should consider “art”?

Ken and I are both hopeful that questions like these will lead us toward a greater understanding and appreciation of art, its purpose, and its execution.

Example

The Relationship Between “Art” and “Beauty”

We often like to discern between one’s “aesthetic intelligence” (our capacity to perceive and enact beauty) and one’s “creative intelligence” (our ability to create beauty through an endless variety of artistic expressions). Both of these lines of development are critical as we consider the important differences between beauty as an inherent quality of the universe, and art as a deliberate creative effort.

I used the example of a sunset earlier — a natural phenomenon that results from the self-organization of mass-energy, which often generates incredible beauty but is not itself an artistic expression, because there is no artist on the other side who is deliberately creating or communicating this beauty. (Of course we can always take a “Spirit-in-2nd-person” view, recognizing a personal God as the ultimate artist who is creating the entire universe at every moment – but it’s perhaps better to keep this conversation focused on artifacts produced by lowly holons like you and me.)

The sunset itself is not art. But the moment I frame the beauty with my perspective, it becomes art.

It seems the math is actually fairly straightforward here:

beauty + perspective = art

As Ken says, art is “anything in a frame”. It is beauty reflected through a perspective, a point of view, a frame of reference.

Example

Does Art Require Conscious Intent?

I think this is one of the most interesting and challenging questions being raised by AI-generated art — can something really be considered “art” if there is no artist’s intent to be found?

One of the features of postmodern art is that it almost entirely does away with “artist intent” altogether. Original intent is irrelevant — all that matters is the observer’s experience of the artwork, and what that artwork may represent to a particular culture or subculture. Which makes a certain amount of sense, as we still have access to wondrous works of art from history that continue to generate meaning and stir something deep inside of us, but whose original intent has long since been lost to the passage of time, despite some universal signifiers (body language, emotional states, etc.) that still speak directly to us today.

Of course, an integral analysis of art does not exclude artist intent as the postmodernists often do — but neither does integral make intent the only means of understanding art. Rather, the meaning of an artwork can be found in all four quadrants — in the artist’s intent, in the content of the artwork itself, in the response of the observer, and in the total social conditions and circumstances surrounding the artist and artwork.

But what if the artwork is being created by an artist that does not possess anything like an “intention”? This is the curious question we now face in the era of AI-generated art.

There is obviously no “artist’s intent” when it comes to the algorithms themselves — there are no interiors to be found there. However, there is intent when it comes to the people who actually designed and programmed these algorithms in the first place. Would we include their intent when enacting art that is generated by the algorithms they created? Should we perhaps consider the algorithms themselves as art?

Example

Does Art Require Communication?

I often think of certain tropical birds, whose plumage is adorned with vibrant and beautiful colors, and who then compose a series of songs and intricate mating dances in order to communicate their beauty and attract a mate. This example seems to get to the core differences between beauty and art — the bird’s feathers are beautiful, but they are not “art”, they are simply part of that bird’s unique kosmic address. However, the song and dance that the bird performs IS an artistic expression, a communication of the bird’s beauty and kosmic address within the 2nd-person space it shares with other birds in its environment.

Which makes art an essential mechanism of what Ken calls the “Miracle of We”. We choose a set of exterior signifiers to communicate a particular referent in our own interior consciousness, reaching out across the infinite void of our own absolute subjectivity in order to make contact with another subject. And then that signifier lands somewhere on your own subjective horizon, where you approach it, examine it, and attempt to decipher its meaning. If this signifier successfully corresponds to a similar interior referent within each of us, a new shared reality emerges between us. This is truly a miracle, I think.

Another example: Ryan Oelke and I recently did a show together called Inhabit: Your Bardo, where we talked about the realization that every moment is a transition, and an opportunity to transcend the karma of our conditioning and add a bit of new creativity. So I had a particular theme in mind — traveling through a bardo realm — and I wanted to generate an AI image to help illustrate this theme. And after a bit of trial and error, I ended up with this image:

Example

And while making the image, something interesting happened. One of the things we discussed was the idea that, in this world of form, there is never any real “solid ground” beneath our feet, we are constantly shifting from one temporary ground to another — all substitute gratifications for the only permanent ground we can find, the Ground of Being itself. When I saw this image, right away I noticed what appears to be a series of carpets piled on the floor, which I immediately took to symbolize this collection of temporary patches of ground that we cling to in the relative world. I didn’t enter any specific prompt that would have resulted in those carpets, but I immediately resonated with the image, noticing how the AI gave me a surprising signifier for a very particular referent in my own head, a memory of this particular segment of my dialogue with Ryan.

But that meaning was not generated by the AI, it was supplied by me — the image was an accidental constellation of random patterns that happened to align with something we discussed in the show.

Example

Which, to my own frame of reference at least, was the moment that “beauty” transformed into “art” — it became a signifier that communicated some interior meaning. The algorithm created something beautiful, I added my own perspective to it, and then it became art. And the moment I select this image and use it for the episode in order to communicate an overall theme for the show, it becomes “art” for everyone else as well. The image is no longer an inert artifact, it is now a psychoactive signifier that communicates meaning from one subject to another.

Beauty plus perspective equals art.

So what are these algorithms actually doing? Are they “art-generators”, or are they more like “beauty-generators”, creating an endless variety of “sunsets” that people can then enact as art, the very moment they bring their own perspective to the forms being created by the algorithm?

It is a very rich, fun, and fascinating conversation, and we hope you enjoy!



More Perspectives

The Future of Artificial Intelligence

Ken Wilber

When it comes to the future of artificial intelligence, we have more questions than answers. Are atoms, molecules, and mathematics alone enough to produce machines with genuine human-equivalent intelligence? Can that intelligence ever become truly conscious and possess the “inner light” of interior self-awareness? Will artificial intelligence be capable of determining its own morals, ethics, and values? Listen as Ken Wilber reflects on the future promise — and potential perils — of artificial intelligence.



The Shape of Things to Come: A Singularity in All Four Quadrants

Corey deVos

It seems clear is that we are seeing a general pattern of accelerated returns in at least four irreducible dimensions of our lives. It is a “singularity in all four quadrants” — Post-Humanism, Post-Scarcity, Post-Irony, and Post-Metaphysics. Let’s take a brief look at each of these dimensions.



Technology, Evolution, and God: Exploring the Technium

Kevin Kelly and Ken Wilber

Wired magazine’s own “Senior Maverick” talks with Ken Wilber about some of the ideas behind Kevin’s blog The Technium, which explores the various ways humanity defines and redefines itself through the interface of science, technology, culture, and consciousness. Kevin also shares some of his own thoughts about the role of spirituality in the 21st century, going into considerable depth around his own spiritual awakening several decades ago.



Ask Ken a Question

FULL SPECTRUM MINDFULNESS

Full Spectrum Mindfulness is a groundbreaking new web course that combines Western approaches to Growing Up with Eastern methods of Waking Up, taught by one of the world’s greatest living philosophers of the mind, Ken Wilber.

Full Spectrum Mindfulness combines hard-hitting mindfulness practice with leading-edge discoveries in neuroscience and developmental psychology, giving you what you need to dramatically deepen your awareness and skill by awakening the eight major levels of evolution alive in you right now.

Learn how Full Spectrum Mindfulness can help you grow up

Previous Episodes of The Ken Show

The Momentous Leap to Integral Consciousness

The Momentous Leap to Integral Consciousness

Ken Wilber and Corey deVos explore some of the unique challenges that come with the transition to Integral stages of development — “the momentous leap” as it is often called. Watch as Ken and Corey try to bring a little bit more light to this particular path of transformation, and maybe leave a few signposts for fellow travelers along the way.
No Boundary: Ken Wilber Goes Back to High School

No Boundary: Ken Wilber Goes Back to High School

Ken speaks with high school students to discuss his 1979 classic, No Boundary. What follows is a lively and deeply insightful exploration of integral spirituality, Ken’s personal practice, and the path of awakening that leads us to nondual realization.
In Pursuit of Wholeness: Making Room for Everything

In Pursuit of Wholeness: Making Room for Everything

This notion of holons — the idea that the universe is fundamentally made of whole/parts within whole/parts within whole/parts, turtles all the way up and turtles all the way down — this isn’t just important in a theoretical or philosophical sense. Understanding holons also helps us make better sense of the world that we live in, and our inner worlds as well. And it helps guide our own growing up, waking up, and cleaning up process.
Integral Critical Theory: The 8 Zones of Racism

Integral Critical Theory: The 8 Zones of Racism

Ken and Corey continue their discussion of the 8 critical zones of integral metatheory, and apply them to the ongoing cultural conversation taking place around race, racism, and other kinds of bigotry that we continue to see in the world. This discussion is a great opportunity to not only learn more about these 8 primordial perspectives that are available to us, but also to see how they can be applied to social and cultural challenges and “wicked problems” such as these.
From the Big Bang to the Eight Primordial Perspectives

From the Big Bang to the Eight Primordial Perspectives

Ken Wilber offers a stunning introduction to the major components of Integral theory and practice — a guided tour that takes us from the very first forms to emerge in the universe, all the way to the eight primordial perspectives that all of our knowledge is constructed from.
Integrating Power

Integrating Power

Ken and Corey take an in-depth look at the multiple kinds of power we find in all four quadrants — interior and exterior power, individual and collective power — as they are expressed up and down the spiral of development.
The Science of Subtle Energy

The Science of Subtle Energy

In this episode of The Ken Show we take a look at Ken's "Comprehensive Theory of Subtle Energy”, which offers an elegant summary of how these energies might be accounted for by integral metatheory and integrated with our scientific understanding of the universe.
Ken Wilber Goes to High School: Sex, Ecology, Spirituality

Ken Wilber Goes to High School: Sex, Ecology, Spirituality

In this very special episode of The Ken Show we are joined by Aissatou Diallo, Zoe Tray, and Noah Delorme, students at Choate Rosemary Hall who have been studying Ken Wilber’s seminal book, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality for their senior year project. Watch as Ken, Aissatou, Zoe, and Noah unpack many of the core insights of SES and discuss the unique value Integral work holds for a new generation of thinkers, leaders, artists, and scholars.
Practice the Wound of Love

Practice the Wound of Love

Watch as Ken and Corey explore the ongoing unfoldment of love along the paths of Waking Up, Growing Up, Opening Up, Cleaning Up, and Showing Up. What follows is one of the most powerful, transformative, and touching conversations that Ken Wilber has ever recorded.
Marx, Mysticism, and Mathematics: Navigating Our Epistemic Collapse

Marx, Mysticism, and Mathematics: Navigating Our Epistemic Collapse

In this episode we continue our fascinating discussion about Integral epistemology, taking a look at the important but partial truths of Marxism, how we go about verifying and confirming spiritual experiences, and the involutionary/evolutionary nature of mathematics.
Integral Epistemology

Integral Epistemology

How do we know stuff? Like all of the great philosophical quandaries, it’s a fundamentally straightforward question that can lead us into an endlessly branching series of chicken-and-egg meditations on the nature of existence (ontology) versus the nature of knowledge (epistemology). In this fascinating episode of The Ken Show, we take a look at a dozen of the most popular schools of epistemological thought — idealism, pragmatism, empiricism, constructivism, etc. — noting their respective contributions and limitations, and how they can all be pulled together into a more Integral epistemology.
Awaken the Eye of Spirit

Awaken the Eye of Spirit

All of us possess three primary modes of perception that we use to disclose reality – the "Eye of Flesh", the "Eye of Mind", and the "Eye of Spirit". Watch as Ken and Corey explore these ideas and the many ways we perceive and interpret spiritual realities.
Integrating Shadow

Integrating Shadow

Ken and Corey offer a stunning overview of the psychological shadow. Ken describes several different kinds of shadow, how shadow can show up differently in all four quadrants, and the relationship between shadow, violence, and social transformation.
Coronavirus and a Course in Anti-Fragility

Coronavirus and a Course in Anti-Fragility

Ken and Corey respond to the COVID-19 pandemic by suggesting a far more comprehensive approach to health and healing. Watch as we take a tour through all four quadrants of healthy living — a much-needed guide to integral anti-fragility in the 21st century.
The Four Quadrants: A Guided Tour

The Four Quadrants: A Guided Tour

Ken and Corey take a in-depth tour through one of Ken’s most well-known contributions to integral philosophy: the Four Quadrants. Watch as Ken shares his personal story about the origins of the Four Quadrant model — the day everything came together — as he weaves 3rd-person theoretical descriptions of the model with his own 1st-person experience and creative process.
Big Time: Integral Historiography and You

Big Time: Integral Historiography and You

Ken unpacks his own approach to integral historiography, helping us to better understand our own place in history — and history's place in us.
Integral Social Justice

Integral Social Justice

In this stunning 3 hour discussion, Ken Wilber offers his own views around healthy and unhealthy forms of social justice, praising the healthy and legitimate efforts to enact social justice over the generations while noting how much of today’s broken discourse around social justice is helping to perpetuate multiple forms of injustice.
Wicked Problems: Gun Violence

Wicked Problems: Gun Violence

In this exclusive series, Ken and Corey take an in-depth look at America’s ongoing struggle with gun violence, using the four quadrants to track many of the most critical and commonly-blamed factors, conditions, and causes that seem to be contributing to this terribly wicked problem.
Kosmos: An Integral Voyage

Kosmos: An Integral Voyage

Ken Wilber and Corey deVos ponder the evolutionary mysteries of the universe, speculating on how abundant life might be in the kosmos, why we haven’t met any of our galactic neighbors yet, and what might happen if a UFO landed on the White House lawn. It’s a fun conversation — and one that takes its subject matter more seriously than you might expect. Whether you are a true believer of UFO phenomena or an iron-clad skeptic, you don’t want to miss this fascinating and far-reaching exploration.
The Varieties of Integral Spiritual Experience

The Varieties of Integral Spiritual Experience

Watch as Ken and Corey explore the path of Waking Up — a guided tour through temporary states of consciousness that include everything from emotional states to chemically-induced states to the direct, immediate experience of timeless reality, revealing an infinitely renewable source of energy, resilience, and creative inspiration that rests at the very center of you.
The Many Ways We Grow

The Many Ways We Grow

Human development is uneven, which means that we are better at some things than we are at others. Some skills come more naturally to us, and others are more difficult to acquire. Watch as Ken and Corey explore each of these developmental capacities in detail, offering a powerful summary of human potentials, talents, and intelligences — a comprehensive map of the territory of “you” that will help guide your own ongoing growth and development.
Growing Up: A Guided Tour

Growing Up: A Guided Tour

In this episode of The Ken Show we explore one of the most central elements of integral metatheory: growing up through multiple stages of developmental maturity. Watch as Ken and Corey offer a guided tour through each of the major stages on the Path of Growing Up — an exploration of your own greatest, deepest potentials — and offer some simple practices to help you actualize those potentials.
On the Front Line of the Culture War — Give Me Some Real Examples, Not Just Theories!

On the Front Line of the Culture War — Give Me Some Real Examples, Not Just Theories!

Watch as Ken and Corey offer their views on some of the most controversial policy debates of our time, each of which has become a battle line in our constantly escalating culture wars.
The Baby and the Bathwater: Saving Liberalism

The Baby and the Bathwater: Saving Liberalism

In this episode of The Ken Show we explore five themes near and dear to the liberal heart — tolerance, nonviolence, power, privilege, and gender — celebrating the healthy aspects of each that we want to include in a more integral embrace, while weeding out the unhealthy regressive narratives that most of these have devolved into.
Ken Wilber

About Ken Wilber

Ken Wilber is a preeminent scholar of the Integral stage of human development. He is an internationally acknowledged leader, founder of Integral Institute, and co-founder of Integral Life. Ken is the originator of arguably the first truly comprehensive or integrative world philosophy, aptly named “Integral Theory”.

Corey deVos

About Corey deVos

Corey W. deVos is Editor-in-Chief of Integral Life, as well as Managing Editor of KenWilber.com. He has worked for Integral Institute/Integal Life since Spring of 2003, and has been a student of integral theory and practice since 1996. Corey is also a professional woodworker, and many of his artworks can be found in his VisionLogix art gallery.

Notable Replies

  1. This was a wild and wonderful episode, loved it! I was inspired to go to one of the sites that offers free use and put in my referents and style, and was surprised by how much of ‘me’ I could see in the piece, all unintended. It was fun! For people who want to play with AI generated art, I watched a video that claimed the best freebie site is Playground (can create 1000 images per day if you like, and allows for more detail in the piece similar to MidJourney), but Night Cafe and Open AI’s Dall-E2 were also recommended.

    Some great discussion around this topic, as suggested by the write-up here. Thanks!

Continue the discussion at community.integrallife.com

Participants