Intrinsic Value refers to the inherent worth or value of something, which is independent of external factors. It is the value that something has “in itself,” or “for its own sake.” This value is often associated with qualities such as authenticity, self-worth, and inner strength. However, an overemphasis on intrinsic value can lead to a disregard for the practical or utilitarian aspects of things, a lack of motivation for improvement (since value is inherent and not dependent on achievement), and a potential for complacency.

Extrinsic Value, on the other hand, refers to the value that is assigned to something by external factors. This could be the societal, economic, or utilitarian value of something. It is the value that something has because of the effects it can produce. An overemphasis on extrinsic value can lead to a lack of appreciation for inherent worth, a dependence on external validation, and a potential for exploitation.

The challenge here lies in managing this polarity effectively, ensuring a dynamic balance between intrinsic and extrinsic value. This involves recognizing the value of both poles, navigating the tensions between them, and striving for a state where intrinsic and extrinsic value mutually reinforce each other, promoting growth, development, and a deeper understanding of the multidimensional Kosmos.

• 

• Integrated Polarity: Balanced Self-Worth
  Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic value to promote a comprehensive sense of self-worth that recognizes both inherent worth and societal contribution. This allows for a greater sense of self-acceptance, authenticity, contribution, and societal connection.

  Disintegrated Polarity: Imbalanced Self-Worth
  Either prioritizing intrinsic value to the point of neglecting societal contribution and connection, leading to complacency and disconnection, or prioritizing extrinsic value to the point of losing self-identity and well-being, leading to dependence on external validation and burnout. This creates an imbalanced sense of self-worth that can limit personal and societal growth.

This polarity encapsulates the dynamic interplay between Differentiation, which emphasizes the uniqueness and distinctiveness of individual elements, and Integration, which underscores the interconnectedness and interdependence of these elements. Differentiation and Integration can be seen both as a sequential process (fusion to differentiation to dissociation to integration, as shown above), as well as a simultaneous process, where both exist in polarity with each other and must occur in tandem to prevent the extremes of dissociation (differentiation without integration) and fusion (integration without differentiation).

In the multidimensional Kosmos, as described by Ken Wilber, these are not opposing forces but rather complementary aspects of a continuous process of evolution: “These appear as opposites (or utterly opposed tendencies) only in a flatland ontology, where more of the one means less of the other. But in the multidimensional Kosmos, more of one means more of the other. They join hands endlessly to produce new whole/parts or many/ones or holons. The dialectics of depth . . .” -Ken Wilber

As a sequential process, we often begin in a state of fusion, where individual elements are not yet distinct. Differentiation then occurs, allowing for the expression of unique characteristics and qualities. However, if differentiation goes too far, it can lead to dissociation, a state of fragmentation or reductionism. Integration follows differentiation, bringing together the distinct elements into a cohesive whole. However, without proper differentiation, integration can return us to to a new kind of fusion, where the individual elements lose their distinctiveness.

The challenge, then, lies in managing this effectively, both as a sequence and as an ongoing polarity, ensuring a dynamic balance between coherent differentiation and integration. This involves recognizing the value of both poles, navigating the tensions between them, and striving for a state where differentiation and integration mutually reinforce each other, promoting growth, development, and a deeper understanding of the multidimensional Kosmos.

• 

• Integrated Polarity: Integrated Holarchy
  This represents a state where differentiation and integration are in balance, leading to a dynamic interplay of unique elements forming a cohesive whole. In this state, individual elements maintain their distinctiveness while contributing to the larger system, creating a holarchy. This allows for a rich tapestry of diversity within a unified framework, promoting growth, development, and a deeper understanding of the multidimensional Kosmos.

  Disintegrated Polarity: Fusion and Dissociation
  This represents a state where the balance between differentiation and integration is lost. Overemphasis on differentiation without integration can lead to dissociation, a state of fragmentation or isolation where individual elements are disconnected from the whole. On the other hand, overemphasis on integration without proper differentiation can lead to fusion, where individual elements lose their distinctiveness and merge into an indistinguishable mass. Both scenarios hinder the dynamic interplay of elements and the formation of a cohesive whole, limiting growth and development.